Jim Meyering <j...@meyering.net> wrote: > If you don't want your name on it, let me know. > I listed you as the author mainly for the comment. > I too would have preferred an inline function, but feel that the number > of parameters would be too large. Think of this as a stopgap > measure to avoid risk of divergence in those two blocks of code.
I agree. I also think that the number of parameters would be too large by using inline functions forcely. As a result, I think your fix is better. Could you push it?
