Hi Eric, On Sep 24, 2013, at 10:07 AM, Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 09/23/2013 09:28 AM, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: >> >> Clearly, it should at least check whether the compiler is actually gcc >> before piling >> on the flags, although I don't think it is serious enough to warrant another >> release. >> >> Eric, do you mind if I revert that change in branch-1.4 in case of a 1.4.18 >> in future? > > No, all we need to do is update m4 to the latest upstream gnulib, where > it has already been fixed to check for gcc when using gl_WARN_ADD. Agreed. For some reason 2 days passed between my pressing send on that post, and it actually arriving at the list, and quite a lot happened during those two days that superseded my request :) Cheers, -- Gary V. Vaughan (gary AT gnu DOT org)
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
