Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Eli Zaretskii replied with this statement: > > Since DOS is no longer an issue, I assume we should use the ".in.h" > suffix instead? I can propose a patch along those lines.
Good! You probably already know that fts_.h is a special case, in that it's not a template. As for how to get rid of the underscore, here's what I've been planning for a long time: [background: there are fts functions and an fts.h in glibc, but there are fundamental ABI differences, so glibc cannot (or will not) break ABI compatibility to take advantage of the improvements in the gnulib version. ] So, I'm going to rename everything, from the structures to the public functions and the files themselves. There will be a new module, probably named gfts, with all of the renamed symbols and files. I'll deprecate the old fts module and eventually remove it.
