On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 11:14 AM Chet Ramey <chet.ra...@case.edu> wrote:

> On 6/17/25 11:03 AM, Joel Ebel wrote:
>
> > After some digging, we found that in our environment there's no upper
> bound
> > on RLIMIT_STACK, so it's set to the maximum allowed value of
> > RLIM64_INFINITY or 2^64-1
> > Then make sets the stack limit to the maximum value, again
> RLIM64_INFINITY.
> > glibc calculates ARG_MAX by dividing the current value of RLIMIT_STACK
> by
> > 4, which gives us the 2^62-1 we're seeing.
>
> So a suitable `ulimit -s' would do the trick?
>

Yes, I believe it would. Where are you proposing that it should be run?
  • exec3.sub never f... Joel Ebel via Bug reports for the GNU Bourne Again SHell
    • Re: exec3.su... Martin D Kealey
      • Re: exec... Joel Ebel via Bug reports for the GNU Bourne Again SHell
        • Re: ... Chet Ramey
          • ... Joel Ebel via Bug reports for the GNU Bourne Again SHell
            • ... Joel Ebel via Bug reports for the GNU Bourne Again SHell
              • ... Chet Ramey
                • ... Joel Ebel via Bug reports for the GNU Bourne Again SHell
                • ... Chet Ramey
                • ... Joel Ebel via Bug reports for the GNU Bourne Again SHell
                • ... Chet Ramey
      • Re: exec... Lawrence Velázquez

Reply via email to