On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 9:09 AM Joel Ebel <jbe...@google.com> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 4:03 PM Chet Ramey <chet.ra...@case.edu> wrote: > >> On 6/7/25 4:42 PM, Joel Ebel via Bug reports for the GNU Bourne Again >> SHell >> wrote: >> >> > I appreciate the effort to make the test run more efficiently and >> faster, >> > and that's probably a good idea, but I think there still needs to be a >> way >> > out. I didn't express just how huge our ARG_MAX is. It's 2^62 or 4.6 >> > exabytes. I don't think there's any way to reasonably expect that this >> test >> > will complete with that environment, so I still need a way of skipping >> the >> > test. >> >> So `getconf ARG_MAX' returns 4611686018427387904? I can do something >> with that. >> > > That's correct > It's possible that getconf isn't even available in our testing environment, but I'm not sure why the script is giving me such a large number there.
