On 6/7/25 4:42 PM, Joel Ebel via Bug reports for the GNU Bourne Again SHell wrote:

I appreciate the effort to make the test run more efficiently and faster,
and that's probably a good idea, but I think there still needs to be a way
out. I didn't express just how huge our ARG_MAX is. It's 2^62 or 4.6
exabytes. I don't think there's any way to reasonably expect that this test
will complete with that environment, so I still need a way of skipping the
test.

So `getconf ARG_MAX' returns 4611686018427387904? I can do something
with that.

--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
                 ``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU    c...@case.edu    http://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/

  • exec3.sub never f... Joel Ebel via Bug reports for the GNU Bourne Again SHell
    • Re: exec3.su... Martin D Kealey
      • Re: exec... Joel Ebel via Bug reports for the GNU Bourne Again SHell
        • Re: ... Chet Ramey
          • ... Joel Ebel via Bug reports for the GNU Bourne Again SHell
            • ... Joel Ebel via Bug reports for the GNU Bourne Again SHell
              • ... Chet Ramey
                • ... Joel Ebel via Bug reports for the GNU Bourne Again SHell
                • ... Chet Ramey
                • ... Joel Ebel via Bug reports for the GNU Bourne Again SHell
                • ... Chet Ramey
      • Re: exec... Lawrence Velázquez

Reply via email to