bug-autoconf  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: Fortran library finding bug GNU Autoconf Autoconf 2.61 (and others) Eric Blake
• [sr #108144] ./configure could recommend packages to install through local package manager Andrew Engelbrecht
  • [sr #108144] ./configure could recommend packages to install through local package manager Eric Blake
  • Re: [sr #108144] ./configure could recommend packages to install through local package manager Paul Eggert
  • Re: [sr #108144] ./configure could recommend packages to install through local package manager Adrian Bunk
  • Re: [sr #108144] ./configure could recommend packages to install through local package manager Paul Eggert
  • Re: [sr #108144] ./configure could recommend packages to install through local package manager Adrian Bunk
  • [sr #108144] ./configure could recommend packages to install through local package manager Zack Weinberg
• Wrong AC_PROG_LN_S test on MSYS with 2.68 daniel . f . starke
  • Re: Wrong AC_PROG_LN_S test on MSYS with 2.68 Adrian Bunk
• Documentation and AC_DEFINE/AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED Brad Smith
  • Re: Documentation and AC_DEFINE/AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED Paul Eggert
  • Re: Documentation and AC_DEFINE/AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED Eric Blake
• Re: [PATCH] AC_PROG_CC_C11: new macro, which AC_PROG_CC_STDC now defaults to Paul Eggert
  • Re: [PATCH] AC_PROG_CC_C11: new macro, which AC_PROG_CC_STDC now defaults to Jim Meyering
• [GNU Autoconf 2.69.23-388d] testsuite: 35 failed (autom4te preselections) Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.69.23-388d] testsuite: 35 failed (autom4te preselections) Eric Blake
  • Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.69.23-388d] testsuite: 35 failed (autom4te preselections) Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.69.23-388d] testsuite: 35 failed (autom4te preselections) Eric Blake
  • Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.69.23-388d] testsuite: 35 failed (autom4te preselections) Stefano Lattarini
• AC_PROG_CC_* shouldn't append multiple options Adrian Bunk
  • Re: AC_PROG_CC_* shouldn't append multiple options Paul Eggert
  • Re: AC_PROG_CC_* shouldn't append multiple options Paul Eggert
  • Re: AC_PROG_CC_* shouldn't append multiple options Andrew W. Nosenko
  • Re: AC_PROG_CC_* shouldn't append multiple options Adrian Bunk
  • Re: AC_PROG_CC_* shouldn't append multiple options Andrew W. Nosenko
  • Re: AC_PROG_CC_* shouldn't append multiple options Adrian Bunk
  • Re: AC_PROG_CC_* shouldn't append multiple options Andrew W. Nosenko
  • Re: AC_PROG_CC_* shouldn't append multiple options Adrian Bunk
  • Re: AC_PROG_CC_* shouldn't append multiple options Andrew W. Nosenko
  • Re: AC_PROG_CC_* shouldn't append multiple options Adrian Bunk
  • Re: AC_PROG_CC_* shouldn't append multiple options Adrian Bunk
• bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Adrian Bunk
  • Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Adrian Bunk
  • Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Paul Eggert
  • Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Adrian Bunk
  • Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Eric Blake
  • Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Adrian Bunk
  • Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Paul Eggert
  • Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Adrian Bunk
  • Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Paul Eggert
  • Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Adrian Bunk
  • Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Paul Eggert
  • Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Adrian Bunk
  • Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Paul Eggert
  • Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Adrian Bunk
  • Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Paul Eggert
  • Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Adrian Bunk
  • Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Paul Eggert
  • Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Adrian Bunk
  • Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Adrian Bunk
  • Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Andrew W. Nosenko
  • Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Adrian Bunk
  • Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Paul Eggert
  • Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Adrian Bunk
  • Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Paul Eggert
  • Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Adrian Bunk
  • Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Paul Eggert
  • Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Adrian Bunk
  • Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Peter Rosin
  • Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Adrian Bunk
• autoconf-2.69 pkgsrc patch Thomas Klausner
  • Re: autoconf-2.69 pkgsrc patch Eric Blake
  • Re: autoconf-2.69 pkgsrc patch Thomas Klausner
• AC_CHECK_ALIGNOF cross-compile detection fails with newer gcc and offsetof fallback Mike Frysinger
  • Re: AC_CHECK_ALIGNOF cross-compile detection fails with newer gcc and offsetof fallback Eric Blake
  • Re: AC_CHECK_ALIGNOF cross-compile detection fails with newer gcc and offsetof fallback Paul Eggert
• Fink install of 2.69-1 on Mac OS X v 10.5.8, Xcode 3.1.4 Bill Nelson
• AC_SUBST is temperamental in expanding its first argument. Nick Bowler
  • Re: AC_SUBST is temperamental in expanding its first argument. Eric Blake
• Autoconf AC_CHECK_SIZEOF always 0 on CentOS Inge Henriksen
  • Re: Autoconf AC_CHECK_SIZEOF always 0 on CentOS Eric Blake
  • Re: Autoconf AC_CHECK_SIZEOF always 0 on CentOS Inge Henriksen
  • Re: Autoconf AC_CHECK_SIZEOF always 0 on CentOS Eric Blake
• Re: Folder naming bug. Eric Blake
• Re: [FYI] {maint} tests: avoid spurious failure of 't/uninstall-fail.sh' on OpenIndiana Eric Blake
  • Re: [FYI] {maint} tests: avoid spurious failure of 't/uninstall-fail.sh' on OpenIndiana Stefano Lattarini
• ampersand in path name K Richard Pixley
  • Re: ampersand in path name Eric Blake
• ax_cxx_gcc_abi_demangle.m4: missing header Andriy Gapon
  • Re: ax_cxx_gcc_abi_demangle.m4: missing header Eric Blake
• fail to run aclocal Xuanye An
  • Re: fail to run aclocal Eric Blake
• test -z and test -n DESTDIR support James Smith
  • Re: test -z and test -n DESTDIR support Eric Blake
  • Re: test -z and test -n DESTDIR support Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: test -z and test -n DESTDIR support James Smith
• Possible typo in Autoconf manual Edward Chernenko
  • Re: Possible typo in Autoconf manual Eric Blake
• [sr #108092] AC_PROG_GREP can select /usr/xpg4/bin/grep under Solaris 9 but it doesn't support long lines Yann Rouillard
  • [sr #108092] AC_PROG_GREP can select /usr/xpg4/bin/grep under Solaris 9 but it doesn't support long lines Zack Weinberg
  • [sr #108092] AC_PROG_GREP can select /usr/xpg4/bin/grep under Solaris 9 but it doesn't support long lines Paul Eggert
  • [sr #108092] AC_PROG_GREP can select /usr/xpg4/bin/grep under Solaris 9 but it doesn't support long lines Zack Weinberg
• Autoconf testsuite failure (likely spurious) with the development version of Automake Stefano Lattarini
• "-v" in CFLAGS breaks autoconf -fPIC and some other tests Knut Petersen
  • Re: "-v" in CFLAGS breaks autoconf -fPIC and some other tests Mike Frysinger
  • Re: "-v" in CFLAGS breaks autoconf -fPIC and some other tests Václav Zeman
• Re: Fwd: Re: bug version number of autoconf Eric Blake
  • Re: Fwd: Re: bug version number of autoconf gilles . charabot
• bug version bug-autoconf gilles . charabot
  • Re: bug version bug-autoconf Eric Blake
• CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Patrice Dumas
  • Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Eli Zaretskii
  • Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Patrice Dumas
  • Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Eli Zaretskii
  • Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Patrice Dumas
  • Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Eric Blake
  • Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Patrice Dumas
  • Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Patrice Dumas
  • Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Eli Zaretskii
  • Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Eric Blake
  • Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Eric Blake
  • Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Eli Zaretskii
  • Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Patrice Dumas
  • Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Eli Zaretskii
  • Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Patrice Dumas
  • Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Eli Zaretskii
  • Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Patrice Dumas
  • Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Eli Zaretskii
  • Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Patrice Dumas
  • Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Patrice Dumas
  • Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Eli Zaretskii
  • Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Eric Blake
  • Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Patrice Dumas
  • Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Karl Berry
  • Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Eric Blake
• [GNU Autoconf 2.69] testsuite: 270 273 274 276 277 278 279 ... Perry Smith
• Re: test -f //dot Eric Blake
  • [PATCH] m4sh: avoid // issues in _AS_PATH_WALK Eric Blake
  • Re: [PATCH] m4sh: avoid // issues in _AS_PATH_WALK Paul Eggert
  • Re: [PATCH] m4sh: avoid // issues in _AS_PATH_WALK Eric Blake
• Re: [PATCH] {master} aclocal: deprecate ACLOCAL_AMFLAGS, trace AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIR instead Stefano Lattarini
  • [PATCH 1/2] AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIR: accept more than one argument Stefano Lattarini
  • [PATCH 2/2] docs: ACLOCAL_AMFLAGS will become obsolescent in Automake 1.13 Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: [PATCH 1/2] AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIR: accept more than one argument Eric Blake
  • Re: [PATCH 1/2] AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIR: accept more than one argument Eric Blake
  • Re: [PATCH 1/2] AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIR: accept more than one argument Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: [PATCH 1/2] AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIR: accept more than one argument Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: [PATCH 1/2] AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIR: accept more than one argument Stefano Lattarini
• Autoconf should allow the developer to require a POSIX shell Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: Autoconf should allow the developer to require a POSIX shell Paul Eggert
• Re: [PATCH] t9010: Open backflow FIFO once to work around kernel race condition Stefano Lattarini
• Re: AM_MISSING_PROG undocumented Eric Blake
  • Re: bug#11793: AM_MISSING_PROG undocumented Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: bug#11793: AM_MISSING_PROG undocumented Eric Blake
  • Re: bug#11793: AM_MISSING_PROG undocumented Stefano Lattarini
• Re: [bug-gzip] gzip-1.5 test failures on FreeBSD 9.0 and NetBSD 5.1 Eric Blake
  • Re: [bug-gzip] gzip-1.5 test failures on FreeBSD 9.0 and NetBSD 5.1 Paul Eggert
  • Re: [bug-gzip] gzip-1.5 test failures on FreeBSD 9.0 and NetBSD 5.1 Eric Blake
• [with patch] Use -### instead of -v to detect linker options Jeroen Demeyer
• Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.63] testsuite: 1 8 9 10 12 14 18 20 21 22 23 24 25 27 28 50 133 136 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 failed, 91 passed unexpectedly Eric Blake
• Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.68b] testsuite: 100 233 298 436 454 482 failed Eric Blake
• Autoconf on-line manual not updated to 2.69 Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: Autoconf on-line manual not updated to 2.69 Eric Blake
  • Re: Autoconf on-line manual not updated to 2.69 Eric Blake
• _AC_PROG_{CC,CXX}_G and unwanted -O2 switch Václav Zeman
  • Re: _AC_PROG_{CC,CXX}_G and unwanted -O2 switch Mike Frysinger
• autoconf implementation for powl() Tom Vijlbrief
  • Re: autoconf implementation for powl() Eric Blake
• go.m4 in autoconf-2.69 assumes old os.Open API Adam Sampson
• AC_CHECK_ALIGNOF fails when cross-compiling with gcc >= 4.5 Michael Olbrich
  • Re: AC_CHECK_ALIGNOF fails when cross-compiling with gcc >= 4.5 Eric Blake
  • Re: AC_CHECK_ALIGNOF fails when cross-compiling with gcc >= 4.5 Michael Olbrich
  • Re: AC_CHECK_ALIGNOF fails when cross-compiling with gcc >= 4.5 Michael Olbrich
  • Re: AC_CHECK_ALIGNOF fails when cross-compiling with gcc >= 4.5 Eric Blake
• [GNU Autoconf 2.69] testsuite: 231 failed Bruno Haible
  • Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.69] testsuite: 231 failed Bruno Haible
• GNU autoconf 2.69 released [stable] Eric Blake
• [sr #108033] checking how to run the C preprocessor does not work Vincent Belaïche
  • [sr #108033] checking how to run the C preprocessor does not work Eric Blake
• [sr #108032] a.exe erronously detected by Avast! antivirus as a Win32 Trojan generator Vincent Belaïche
• Problem with aclocal rajeshwari b
• [no subject] rajeshwari b
• Removal of double check from AC_CHECK_HEADER (was Re: AC_INCLUDES_DEFAULT does not need to probe...) Zack Weinberg
  • Re: Removal of double check from AC_CHECK_HEADER (was Re: AC_INCLUDES_DEFAULT does not need to probe...) Paul Eggert
• Installing gcc on Mac OS X Asad, Randa (asadrs)
• AC_INCLUDES_DEFAULT does not need to probe for headers that are part of C89 or POSIX.1 anymore Zack Weinberg
  • Re: AC_INCLUDES_DEFAULT does not need to probe for headers that are part of C89 or POSIX.1 anymore Paul Eggert
  • Re: AC_INCLUDES_DEFAULT does not need to probe for headers that are part of C89 or POSIX.1 anymore Zack Weinberg
  • Re: AC_INCLUDES_DEFAULT does not need to probe for headers that are part of C89 or POSIX.1 anymore Russ Allbery
  • Re: AC_INCLUDES_DEFAULT does not need to probe for headers that are part of C89 or POSIX.1 anymore Zack Weinberg
  • Re: AC_INCLUDES_DEFAULT does not need to probe for headers that are part of C89 or POSIX.1 anymore Paul Eggert
  • socket code on Windows (was: AC_INCLUDES_DEFAULT does not need to probe for headers that are part of C89 or POSIX.1 anymore) Russ Allbery
  • Re: socket code on Windows (was: AC_INCLUDES_DEFAULT does not need to probe for headers that are part of C89 or POSIX.1 anymore) Zack Weinberg
• autoconf bug report yanjing.guo
• Re: AC_C_CONST is sensitive about -W -Wall -Werror CFLAGS. Eric Blake
  • Re: AC_C_CONST is sensitive about -W -Wall -Werror CFLAGS. Artur R. Czechowski
• [bug-autoconf] autoconf-2.68b comment Nelson H. F. Beebe
  • Re: [bug-autoconf] autoconf-2.68b comment Eric Blake
• [sr #107986] autoconf should reject or specifically warn about obviously wrong configure.ac files anonymous
  • [sr #107986] autoconf should reject or specifically warn about obviously wrong configure.ac files Eric Blake
  • [sr #107986] autoconf should reject or specifically warn about obviously wrong configure.ac files David A. Wheeler
  • [sr #107986] autoconf should reject or specifically warn about obviously wrong configure.ac files David A. Wheeler
  • [sr #107986] autoconf should reject or specifically warn about obviously wrong configure.ac files David A. Wheeler
  • [sr #107986] autoconf should reject or specifically warn about obviously wrong configure.ac files Zack Weinberg
  • [sr #107986] autoconf should reject or specifically warn about obviously wrong configure.ac files Zack Weinberg
  • [sr #107986] autoconf should reject or specifically warn about obviously wrong configure.ac files David A. Wheeler
  • [sr #107986] autoconf should reject or specifically warn about obviously wrong configure.ac files Zack Weinberg

• Earlier messages
• Later messages