bug-autoconf  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: bug#13378: Cleaning up AC_PROG_CC_C_O semantics Eric Blake
  • Re: bug#13378: Cleaning up AC_PROG_CC_C_O semantics Stefano Lattarini
• F77 search order change request Jonathan Hogg
• autoreconf doesn't honor m4_include Werner LEMBERG
• Re: bug#13349: [IMPORTANT] Could we just assuming support for make recursive variable expansion unconditionally? Eric Blake
  • Re: bug#13349: [IMPORTANT] Could we just assuming support for make recursive variable expansion unconditionally? Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: bug#13349: [IMPORTANT] Could we just assuming support for make recursive variable expansion unconditionally? Eric Blake
  • Re-execute with the "correct" make implementation Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: Re-execute with the "correct" make implementation Nick Bowler
  • Re: bug#13349: Re-execute with the "correct" make implementation Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: bug#13349: Re-execute with the "correct" make implementation Bob Friesenhahn
  • Re: bug#13349: Re-execute with the "correct" make implementation Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: Re-execute with the "correct" make implementation Eric Blake
  • Re: Re-execute with the "correct" make implementation Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: Re-execute with the "correct" make implementation Eric Blake
  • Re: bug#13349: Re-execute with the "correct" make implementation Stefano Lattarini
  • [PATCH] docs: mention $MAKE during configure Eric Blake
  • Re: [PATCH] docs: mention $MAKE during configure Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: [PATCH] docs: mention $MAKE during configure Eric Blake
  • Re: [PATCH] docs: mention $MAKE during configure Stefano Lattarini
• [GNU Autoconf 2.69.60-5766] testsuite: 132 failed Joshua C.
  • Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.69.60-5766] testsuite: 132 failed Eric Blake
  • Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.69.60-5766] testsuite: 132 failed Joshua C.
  • Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.69.60-5766] testsuite: 132 failed Joshua C.
  • Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.69.60-5766] testsuite: 132 failed Eric Blake
  • Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.69.60-5766] testsuite: 132 failed Joshua C.
• error with autoconf 2.69 and gccgo (error: cannot run Go compiled programs.) Markus Rothe
  • Re: error with autoconf 2.69 and gccgo (error: cannot run Go compiled programs.) Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: error with autoconf 2.69 and gccgo (error: cannot run Go compiled programs.) Julian Graham
• Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.69.59-adc84] testsuite: 132 355 failed Eric Blake
  • Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.69.59-adc84] testsuite: 132 355 failed Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.69.59-adc84] testsuite: 132 355 failed Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.69.59-adc84] testsuite: 132 355 failed Eric Blake
  • Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.69.59-adc84] testsuite: 132 355 failed Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.69.59-adc84] testsuite: 132 355 failed Eric Blake
  • [PATCH] AT_TESTED: fix regression in word splitting Eric Blake
• Autotest: --output Akim Demaille
• Making variably-named .in files work with config.status Reuben Thomas
  • Re: Making variably-named .in files work with config.status Nick Bowler
  • Re: Making variably-named .in files work with config.status Reuben Thomas
• AC_PROG_CC_C99 fails when configure with CFLAGS="-Werror -Wall" ChangZhuo Chen
  • Re: AC_PROG_CC_C99 fails when configure with CFLAGS="-Werror -Wall" Eric Blake
  • Re: AC_PROG_CC_C99 fails when configure with CFLAGS="-Werror -Wall" Paul Eggert
• Please make the Autoconf manual less vague and add more examples Eli Zaretskii
  • Re: Please make the Autoconf manual less vague and add more examples Stefano Lattarini
• Autoconf cannot handle names of m4 builtins in AC_INIT's first argument correctly Stefano Lattarini
• [sr #108182] [doc] Clarification for behaviour of AC_CHECK_FILES Christophe CURIS
  • [sr #108182] [doc] Clarification for behaviour of AC_CHECK_FILES Paul Eggert
  • [sr #108182] [doc] Clarification for behaviour of AC_CHECK_FILES Christophe CURIS
  • [sr #108182] [doc] Clarification for behaviour of AC_CHECK_FILES Zack Weinberg
• [GNU Autoconf 2.69] testsuite: 264 271 286 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 failed Dennis Clarke
  • Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.69] testsuite: 264 271 286 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 failed Paul Eggert
• Test 349 "Go" failed with gccgo 4.7.1, with latest autoconf from master Stefano Lattarini
• 2.69: missing "checking for C++ compiler" Akim Demaille
• 2.69: Autotest's AT_ARG_OPTION does not fill --help properly Akim Demaille
• Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.69] 141 suite failed Eric Blake
  • Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.69] 141 suite failed Vladimir Kraljević
  • Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.69] 141 suite failed Adrian Bunk
• [GNU Autoconf 2.69.38-b038] testsuite: 299 300 302 failed Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.69.38-b038] testsuite: 299 300 302 failed Eric Blake
  • Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.69.38-b038] testsuite: 299 300 302 failed Paul Eggert
• Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.69.35-c8d2] testsuite: 299 300 302 failed Adrian Bunk
• Re: Autoconf example scripts for site defaults Eric Blake
• Fortran library finding bug GNU Autoconf Autoconf 2.61 (and others) Marc W. Mengel
  • Re: Fortran library finding bug GNU Autoconf Autoconf 2.61 (and others) Eric Blake
• [sr #108144] ./configure could recommend packages to install through local package manager Andrew Engelbrecht
  • [sr #108144] ./configure could recommend packages to install through local package manager Eric Blake
  • Re: [sr #108144] ./configure could recommend packages to install through local package manager Paul Eggert
  • Re: [sr #108144] ./configure could recommend packages to install through local package manager Adrian Bunk
  • Re: [sr #108144] ./configure could recommend packages to install through local package manager Paul Eggert
  • Re: [sr #108144] ./configure could recommend packages to install through local package manager Adrian Bunk
  • [sr #108144] ./configure could recommend packages to install through local package manager Zack Weinberg
• Wrong AC_PROG_LN_S test on MSYS with 2.68 daniel . f . starke
  • Re: Wrong AC_PROG_LN_S test on MSYS with 2.68 Adrian Bunk
• Documentation and AC_DEFINE/AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED Brad Smith
  • Re: Documentation and AC_DEFINE/AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED Paul Eggert
  • Re: Documentation and AC_DEFINE/AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED Eric Blake
• Re: [PATCH] AC_PROG_CC_C11: new macro, which AC_PROG_CC_STDC now defaults to Paul Eggert
  • Re: [PATCH] AC_PROG_CC_C11: new macro, which AC_PROG_CC_STDC now defaults to Jim Meyering
• [GNU Autoconf 2.69.23-388d] testsuite: 35 failed (autom4te preselections) Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.69.23-388d] testsuite: 35 failed (autom4te preselections) Eric Blake
  • Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.69.23-388d] testsuite: 35 failed (autom4te preselections) Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.69.23-388d] testsuite: 35 failed (autom4te preselections) Eric Blake
  • Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.69.23-388d] testsuite: 35 failed (autom4te preselections) Stefano Lattarini
• AC_PROG_CC_* shouldn't append multiple options Adrian Bunk
  • Re: AC_PROG_CC_* shouldn't append multiple options Paul Eggert
  • Re: AC_PROG_CC_* shouldn't append multiple options Paul Eggert
  • Re: AC_PROG_CC_* shouldn't append multiple options Andrew W. Nosenko
  • Re: AC_PROG_CC_* shouldn't append multiple options Adrian Bunk
  • Re: AC_PROG_CC_* shouldn't append multiple options Andrew W. Nosenko
  • Re: AC_PROG_CC_* shouldn't append multiple options Adrian Bunk
  • Re: AC_PROG_CC_* shouldn't append multiple options Andrew W. Nosenko
  • Re: AC_PROG_CC_* shouldn't append multiple options Adrian Bunk
  • Re: AC_PROG_CC_* shouldn't append multiple options Andrew W. Nosenko
  • Re: AC_PROG_CC_* shouldn't append multiple options Adrian Bunk
  • Re: AC_PROG_CC_* shouldn't append multiple options Adrian Bunk
• bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Adrian Bunk
  • Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Adrian Bunk
  • Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Paul Eggert
  • Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Adrian Bunk
  • Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Eric Blake
  • Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Adrian Bunk
  • Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Paul Eggert
  • Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Adrian Bunk
  • Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Paul Eggert
  • Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Adrian Bunk
  • Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Paul Eggert
  • Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Adrian Bunk
  • Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Paul Eggert
  • Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Adrian Bunk
  • Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Paul Eggert
  • Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Adrian Bunk
  • Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Paul Eggert
  • Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Adrian Bunk
  • Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Adrian Bunk
  • Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Andrew W. Nosenko
  • Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Adrian Bunk
  • Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Paul Eggert
  • Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Adrian Bunk
  • Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Paul Eggert
  • Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Adrian Bunk
  • Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Paul Eggert
  • Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Adrian Bunk
  • Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Peter Rosin
  • Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Adrian Bunk
• autoconf-2.69 pkgsrc patch Thomas Klausner
  • Re: autoconf-2.69 pkgsrc patch Eric Blake
  • Re: autoconf-2.69 pkgsrc patch Thomas Klausner
• AC_CHECK_ALIGNOF cross-compile detection fails with newer gcc and offsetof fallback Mike Frysinger
  • Re: AC_CHECK_ALIGNOF cross-compile detection fails with newer gcc and offsetof fallback Eric Blake
  • Re: AC_CHECK_ALIGNOF cross-compile detection fails with newer gcc and offsetof fallback Paul Eggert
• Fink install of 2.69-1 on Mac OS X v 10.5.8, Xcode 3.1.4 Bill Nelson
• AC_SUBST is temperamental in expanding its first argument. Nick Bowler
  • Re: AC_SUBST is temperamental in expanding its first argument. Eric Blake
• Autoconf AC_CHECK_SIZEOF always 0 on CentOS Inge Henriksen
  • Re: Autoconf AC_CHECK_SIZEOF always 0 on CentOS Eric Blake
  • Re: Autoconf AC_CHECK_SIZEOF always 0 on CentOS Inge Henriksen
  • Re: Autoconf AC_CHECK_SIZEOF always 0 on CentOS Eric Blake
• Re: Folder naming bug. Eric Blake
• Re: [FYI] {maint} tests: avoid spurious failure of 't/uninstall-fail.sh' on OpenIndiana Eric Blake
  • Re: [FYI] {maint} tests: avoid spurious failure of 't/uninstall-fail.sh' on OpenIndiana Stefano Lattarini
• ampersand in path name K Richard Pixley
  • Re: ampersand in path name Eric Blake
• ax_cxx_gcc_abi_demangle.m4: missing header Andriy Gapon
  • Re: ax_cxx_gcc_abi_demangle.m4: missing header Eric Blake
• fail to run aclocal Xuanye An
  • Re: fail to run aclocal Eric Blake
• test -z and test -n DESTDIR support James Smith
  • Re: test -z and test -n DESTDIR support Eric Blake
  • Re: test -z and test -n DESTDIR support Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: test -z and test -n DESTDIR support James Smith
• Possible typo in Autoconf manual Edward Chernenko
  • Re: Possible typo in Autoconf manual Eric Blake
• [sr #108092] AC_PROG_GREP can select /usr/xpg4/bin/grep under Solaris 9 but it doesn't support long lines Yann Rouillard
  • [sr #108092] AC_PROG_GREP can select /usr/xpg4/bin/grep under Solaris 9 but it doesn't support long lines Zack Weinberg
  • [sr #108092] AC_PROG_GREP can select /usr/xpg4/bin/grep under Solaris 9 but it doesn't support long lines Paul Eggert
  • [sr #108092] AC_PROG_GREP can select /usr/xpg4/bin/grep under Solaris 9 but it doesn't support long lines Zack Weinberg
• Autoconf testsuite failure (likely spurious) with the development version of Automake Stefano Lattarini
• "-v" in CFLAGS breaks autoconf -fPIC and some other tests Knut Petersen
  • Re: "-v" in CFLAGS breaks autoconf -fPIC and some other tests Mike Frysinger
  • Re: "-v" in CFLAGS breaks autoconf -fPIC and some other tests Václav Zeman
• Re: Fwd: Re: bug version number of autoconf Eric Blake
  • Re: Fwd: Re: bug version number of autoconf gilles . charabot
• bug version bug-autoconf gilles . charabot
  • Re: bug version bug-autoconf Eric Blake
• CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Patrice Dumas
  • Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Eli Zaretskii
  • Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Patrice Dumas
  • Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Eli Zaretskii
  • Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Patrice Dumas
  • Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Eric Blake
  • Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Patrice Dumas
  • Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Patrice Dumas
  • Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Eli Zaretskii
  • Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Eric Blake
  • Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Eric Blake
  • Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Eli Zaretskii
  • Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Patrice Dumas
  • Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Eli Zaretskii
  • Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Patrice Dumas
  • Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Eli Zaretskii
  • Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Patrice Dumas
  • Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Eli Zaretskii
  • Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Patrice Dumas
  • Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Patrice Dumas
  • Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Eli Zaretskii
  • Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Eric Blake
  • Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Patrice Dumas
  • Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Karl Berry
  • Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Eric Blake
• [GNU Autoconf 2.69] testsuite: 270 273 274 276 277 278 279 ... Perry Smith
• Re: test -f //dot Eric Blake
  • [PATCH] m4sh: avoid // issues in _AS_PATH_WALK Eric Blake
  • Re: [PATCH] m4sh: avoid // issues in _AS_PATH_WALK Paul Eggert
  • Re: [PATCH] m4sh: avoid // issues in _AS_PATH_WALK Eric Blake
• Re: [PATCH] {master} aclocal: deprecate ACLOCAL_AMFLAGS, trace AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIR instead Stefano Lattarini
  • [PATCH 1/2] AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIR: accept more than one argument Stefano Lattarini
  • [PATCH 2/2] docs: ACLOCAL_AMFLAGS will become obsolescent in Automake 1.13 Stefano Lattarini

• Earlier messages
• Later messages