bug-autoconf  

Messages by Date

• 2012/11/18 [sr #108182] [doc] Clarification for behaviour of AC_CHECK_FILES Christophe CURIS
• 2012/11/17 [sr #108182] [doc] Clarification for behaviour of AC_CHECK_FILES Paul Eggert
• 2012/11/17 [sr #108182] [doc] Clarification for behaviour of AC_CHECK_FILES Christophe CURIS
• 2012/11/10 Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.69] testsuite: 264 271 286 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 failed Paul Eggert
• 2012/11/09 [GNU Autoconf 2.69] testsuite: 264 271 286 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 failed Dennis Clarke
• 2012/10/27 Test 349 "Go" failed with gccgo 4.7.1, with latest autoconf from master Stefano Lattarini
• 2012/10/26 2.69: missing "checking for C++ compiler" Akim Demaille
• 2012/10/25 Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.69] 141 suite failed Adrian Bunk
• 2012/10/25 2.69: Autotest's AT_ARG_OPTION does not fill --help properly Akim Demaille
• 2012/10/23 Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.69] 141 suite failed Vladimir Kraljević
• 2012/10/23 Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.69] 141 suite failed Eric Blake
• 2012/10/16 Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.69.38-b038] testsuite: 299 300 302 failed Paul Eggert
• 2012/10/16 Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.69.38-b038] testsuite: 299 300 302 failed Eric Blake
• 2012/10/16 [GNU Autoconf 2.69.38-b038] testsuite: 299 300 302 failed Stefano Lattarini
• 2012/10/12 Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.69.35-c8d2] testsuite: 299 300 302 failed Adrian Bunk
• 2012/10/08 Re: Autoconf example scripts for site defaults Eric Blake
• 2012/10/02 Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Adrian Bunk
• 2012/10/02 Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Peter Rosin
• 2012/10/02 Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Adrian Bunk
• 2012/10/01 Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Paul Eggert
• 2012/10/01 Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Adrian Bunk
• 2012/10/01 Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Paul Eggert
• 2012/10/01 Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Adrian Bunk
• 2012/09/28 Re: Fortran library finding bug GNU Autoconf Autoconf 2.61 (and others) Eric Blake
• 2012/09/28 Fortran library finding bug GNU Autoconf Autoconf 2.61 (and others) Marc W. Mengel
• 2012/09/28 Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Paul Eggert
• 2012/09/28 Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Adrian Bunk
• 2012/09/28 Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Andrew W. Nosenko
• 2012/09/28 Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Adrian Bunk
• 2012/09/28 Re: [sr #108144] ./configure could recommend packages to install through local package manager Adrian Bunk
• 2012/09/28 Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Adrian Bunk
• 2012/09/27 Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Paul Eggert
• 2012/09/27 Re: [sr #108144] ./configure could recommend packages to install through local package manager Paul Eggert
• 2012/09/27 Re: [sr #108144] ./configure could recommend packages to install through local package manager Adrian Bunk
• 2012/09/27 Re: [sr #108144] ./configure could recommend packages to install through local package manager Paul Eggert
• 2012/09/27 [sr #108144] ./configure could recommend packages to install through local package manager Eric Blake
• 2012/09/27 [sr #108144] ./configure could recommend packages to install through local package manager Andrew Engelbrecht
• 2012/09/27 Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Adrian Bunk
• 2012/09/27 Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Paul Eggert
• 2012/09/27 Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Adrian Bunk
• 2012/09/26 Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Paul Eggert
• 2012/09/26 Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Adrian Bunk
• 2012/09/26 Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Paul Eggert
• 2012/09/26 Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Adrian Bunk
• 2012/09/25 Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Paul Eggert
• 2012/09/25 Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Adrian Bunk
• 2012/09/25 Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Paul Eggert
• 2012/09/25 Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Adrian Bunk
• 2012/09/25 Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Eric Blake
• 2012/09/25 Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Adrian Bunk
• 2012/09/25 Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Paul Eggert
• 2012/09/25 Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Adrian Bunk
• 2012/09/24 Re: Documentation and AC_DEFINE/AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED Eric Blake
• 2012/09/23 Re: AC_PROG_CC_* shouldn't append multiple options Andrew W. Nosenko
• 2012/09/23 Re: Wrong AC_PROG_LN_S test on MSYS with 2.68 Adrian Bunk
• 2012/09/23 Re: AC_PROG_CC_* shouldn't append multiple options Adrian Bunk
• 2012/09/22 Re: Documentation and AC_DEFINE/AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED Paul Eggert
• 2012/09/22 Wrong AC_PROG_LN_S test on MSYS with 2.68 daniel . f . starke
• 2012/09/22 Documentation and AC_DEFINE/AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED Brad Smith
• 2012/09/22 Re: [PATCH] AC_PROG_CC_C11: new macro, which AC_PROG_CC_STDC now defaults to Jim Meyering
• 2012/09/22 Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.69.23-388d] testsuite: 35 failed (autom4te preselections) Stefano Lattarini
• 2012/09/21 Re: [PATCH] AC_PROG_CC_C11: new macro, which AC_PROG_CC_STDC now defaults to Paul Eggert
• 2012/09/21 Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.69.23-388d] testsuite: 35 failed (autom4te preselections) Eric Blake
• 2012/09/21 Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.69.23-388d] testsuite: 35 failed (autom4te preselections) Stefano Lattarini
• 2012/09/21 Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.69.23-388d] testsuite: 35 failed (autom4te preselections) Eric Blake
• 2012/09/21 Re: AC_PROG_CC_* shouldn't append multiple options Andrew W. Nosenko
• 2012/09/21 Re: AC_PROG_CC_* shouldn't append multiple options Adrian Bunk
• 2012/09/21 Re: AC_PROG_CC_* shouldn't append multiple options Andrew W. Nosenko
• 2012/09/21 Re: AC_PROG_CC_* shouldn't append multiple options Adrian Bunk
• 2012/09/21 [GNU Autoconf 2.69.23-388d] testsuite: 35 failed (autom4te preselections) Stefano Lattarini
• 2012/09/21 Re: AC_PROG_CC_* shouldn't append multiple options Adrian Bunk
• 2012/09/21 Re: AC_PROG_CC_* shouldn't append multiple options Adrian Bunk
• 2012/09/21 Re: AC_PROG_CC_* shouldn't append multiple options Andrew W. Nosenko
• 2012/09/20 Re: AC_PROG_CC_* shouldn't append multiple options Paul Eggert
• 2012/09/20 Re: AC_PROG_CC_* shouldn't append multiple options Paul Eggert
• 2012/09/20 AC_PROG_CC_* shouldn't append multiple options Adrian Bunk
• 2012/09/20 bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Adrian Bunk
• 2012/09/15 Re: autoconf-2.69 pkgsrc patch Thomas Klausner
• 2012/09/14 Re: autoconf-2.69 pkgsrc patch Eric Blake
• 2012/09/14 autoconf-2.69 pkgsrc patch Thomas Klausner
• 2012/09/06 Re: AC_CHECK_ALIGNOF cross-compile detection fails with newer gcc and offsetof fallback Paul Eggert
• 2012/09/06 Re: AC_CHECK_ALIGNOF cross-compile detection fails with newer gcc and offsetof fallback Eric Blake
• 2012/09/06 AC_CHECK_ALIGNOF cross-compile detection fails with newer gcc and offsetof fallback Mike Frysinger
• 2012/09/04 Fink install of 2.69-1 on Mac OS X v 10.5.8, Xcode 3.1.4 Bill Nelson
• 2012/08/15 Re: AC_SUBST is temperamental in expanding its first argument. Eric Blake
• 2012/08/15 AC_SUBST is temperamental in expanding its first argument. Nick Bowler
• 2012/08/07 Re: Autoconf AC_CHECK_SIZEOF always 0 on CentOS Eric Blake
• 2012/08/07 Re: Autoconf AC_CHECK_SIZEOF always 0 on CentOS Inge Henriksen
• 2012/08/07 Re: Autoconf AC_CHECK_SIZEOF always 0 on CentOS Eric Blake
• 2012/08/07 Autoconf AC_CHECK_SIZEOF always 0 on CentOS Inge Henriksen
• 2012/08/07 Re: [FYI] {maint} tests: avoid spurious failure of 't/uninstall-fail.sh' on OpenIndiana Stefano Lattarini
• 2012/08/06 Re: Folder naming bug. Eric Blake
• 2012/08/06 Re: [FYI] {maint} tests: avoid spurious failure of 't/uninstall-fail.sh' on OpenIndiana Eric Blake
• 2012/08/01 Re: ampersand in path name Eric Blake
• 2012/07/31 ampersand in path name K Richard Pixley
• 2012/07/26 Re: ax_cxx_gcc_abi_demangle.m4: missing header Eric Blake
• 2012/07/26 ax_cxx_gcc_abi_demangle.m4: missing header Andriy Gapon
• 2012/07/25 Re: test -z and test -n DESTDIR support James Smith
• 2012/07/25 Re: fail to run aclocal Eric Blake
• 2012/07/25 fail to run aclocal Xuanye An
• 2012/07/25 Re: test -z and test -n DESTDIR support Stefano Lattarini
• 2012/07/25 Re: test -z and test -n DESTDIR support Eric Blake
• 2012/07/24 test -z and test -n DESTDIR support James Smith
• 2012/07/23 Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Karl Berry
• 2012/07/23 Re: Possible typo in Autoconf manual Eric Blake
• 2012/07/21 Possible typo in Autoconf manual Edward Chernenko
• 2012/07/21 [sr #108092] AC_PROG_GREP can select /usr/xpg4/bin/grep under Solaris 9 but it doesn't support long lines Yann Rouillard
• 2012/07/21 Re: "-v" in CFLAGS breaks autoconf -fPIC and some other tests Václav Zeman
• 2012/07/21 Autoconf testsuite failure (likely spurious) with the development version of Automake Stefano Lattarini
• 2012/07/21 Re: "-v" in CFLAGS breaks autoconf -fPIC and some other tests Mike Frysinger
• 2012/07/21 "-v" in CFLAGS breaks autoconf -fPIC and some other tests Knut Petersen
• 2012/07/19 Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Patrice Dumas
• 2012/07/19 Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Eli Zaretskii
• 2012/07/19 Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Patrice Dumas
• 2012/07/19 Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Patrice Dumas
• 2012/07/18 Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Stefano Lattarini
• 2012/07/18 Re: IFS clobbering Eric Blake
• 2012/07/18 Re: IFS clobbering Andreas Schwab
• 2012/07/18 Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Eric Blake
• 2012/07/18 Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Eric Blake
• 2012/07/18 Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Eli Zaretskii
• 2012/07/18 Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Eric Blake
• 2012/07/18 Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Patrice Dumas
• 2012/07/18 Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Eli Zaretskii
• 2012/07/18 Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Eli Zaretskii
• 2012/07/18 Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Patrice Dumas
• 2012/07/18 Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Patrice Dumas
• 2012/07/18 Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Eli Zaretskii
• 2012/07/18 Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Patrice Dumas
• 2012/07/18 Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Patrice Dumas
• 2012/07/17 Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Eric Blake
• 2012/07/17 Re: Fwd: Re: bug version number of autoconf gilles . charabot
• 2012/07/17 Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Eli Zaretskii
• 2012/07/17 Re: Fwd: Re: bug version number of autoconf Eric Blake
• 2012/07/17 Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Eric Blake
• 2012/07/17 Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Patrice Dumas
• 2012/07/17 Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Eli Zaretskii
• 2012/07/17 Re: bug version bug-autoconf Eric Blake
• 2012/07/17 bug version bug-autoconf gilles . charabot
• 2012/07/17 Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Patrice Dumas
• 2012/07/16 Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Eli Zaretskii
• 2012/07/16 Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Patrice Dumas
• 2012/07/16 CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Stefano Lattarini
• 2012/07/15 [GNU Autoconf 2.69] testsuite: 270 273 274 276 277 278 279 ... Perry Smith
• 2012/07/13 Re: [PATCH] m4sh: avoid // issues in _AS_PATH_WALK Eric Blake
• 2012/07/13 Re: [PATCH] m4sh: avoid // issues in _AS_PATH_WALK Paul Eggert
• 2012/07/13 [PATCH] m4sh: avoid // issues in _AS_PATH_WALK Eric Blake
• 2012/07/13 Re: test -f //dot Eric Blake
• 2012/07/04 Re: [PATCH 1/2] AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIR: accept more than one argument Stefano Lattarini
• 2012/07/04 Re: [PATCH 1/2] AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIR: accept more than one argument Stefano Lattarini
• 2012/07/04 Re: [PATCH 1/2] AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIR: accept more than one argument Stefano Lattarini
• 2012/07/04 Re: [PATCH 1/2] AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIR: accept more than one argument Eric Blake
• 2012/07/04 Re: [PATCH 1/2] AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIR: accept more than one argument Eric Blake
• 2012/07/04 [PATCH 1/2] AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIR: accept more than one argument Stefano Lattarini
• 2012/07/04 [PATCH 2/2] docs: ACLOCAL_AMFLAGS will become obsolescent in Automake 1.13 Stefano Lattarini
• 2012/07/04 Re: [PATCH] {master} aclocal: deprecate ACLOCAL_AMFLAGS, trace AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIR instead Stefano Lattarini
• 2012/06/30 Re: Autoconf should allow the developer to require a POSIX shell Paul Eggert
• 2012/06/28 Autoconf should allow the developer to require a POSIX shell Stefano Lattarini
• 2012/06/28 Re: bug#11793: AM_MISSING_PROG undocumented Stefano Lattarini
• 2012/06/27 Re: bug#11793: AM_MISSING_PROG undocumented Eric Blake
• 2012/06/26 Re: [PATCH] t9010: Open backflow FIFO once to work around kernel race condition Stefano Lattarini
• 2012/06/26 Re: bug#11793: AM_MISSING_PROG undocumented Stefano Lattarini
• 2012/06/26 Re: AM_MISSING_PROG undocumented Eric Blake
• 2012/06/20 Re: [bug-gzip] gzip-1.5 test failures on FreeBSD 9.0 and NetBSD 5.1 Eric Blake
• 2012/06/20 Re: [bug-gzip] gzip-1.5 test failures on FreeBSD 9.0 and NetBSD 5.1 Paul Eggert
• 2012/06/20 Re: [bug-gzip] gzip-1.5 test failures on FreeBSD 9.0 and NetBSD 5.1 Eric Blake
• 2012/06/15 [with patch] Use -### instead of -v to detect linker options Jeroen Demeyer
• 2012/05/07 Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.63] testsuite: 1 8 9 10 12 14 18 20 21 22 23 24 25 27 28 50 133 136 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 failed, 91 passed unexpectedly Eric Blake
• 2012/05/02 Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.68b] testsuite: 100 233 298 436 454 482 failed Eric Blake
• 2012/05/01 Re: Autoconf on-line manual not updated to 2.69 Eric Blake
• 2012/05/01 Re: Autoconf on-line manual not updated to 2.69 Eric Blake
• 2012/05/01 Autoconf on-line manual not updated to 2.69 Stefano Lattarini
• 2012/04/27 Re: _AC_PROG_{CC,CXX}_G and unwanted -O2 switch Mike Frysinger
• 2012/04/27 _AC_PROG_{CC,CXX}_G and unwanted -O2 switch Václav Zeman
• 2012/04/26 Re: autoconf implementation for powl() Eric Blake
• 2012/04/26 autoconf implementation for powl() Tom Vijlbrief
• 2012/04/26 Re: AC_CHECK_ALIGNOF fails when cross-compiling with gcc >= 4.5 Eric Blake
• 2012/04/26 go.m4 in autoconf-2.69 assumes old os.Open API Adam Sampson
• 2012/04/26 Re: AC_CHECK_ALIGNOF fails when cross-compiling with gcc >= 4.5 Michael Olbrich
• 2012/04/26 Re: AC_CHECK_ALIGNOF fails when cross-compiling with gcc >= 4.5 Michael Olbrich
• 2012/04/25 Re: AC_CHECK_ALIGNOF fails when cross-compiling with gcc >= 4.5 Eric Blake
• 2012/04/25 AC_CHECK_ALIGNOF fails when cross-compiling with gcc >= 4.5 Michael Olbrich
• 2012/04/25 Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.69] testsuite: 231 failed Bruno Haible
• 2012/04/25 [GNU Autoconf 2.69] testsuite: 231 failed Bruno Haible
• 2012/04/24 GNU autoconf 2.69 released [stable] Eric Blake
• 2012/04/23 [sr #108033] checking how to run the C preprocessor does not work Eric Blake
• 2012/04/21 [sr #108033] checking how to run the C preprocessor does not work Vincent Belaïche
• 2012/04/21 [sr #108032] a.exe erronously detected by Avast! antivirus as a Win32 Trojan generator Vincent Belaïche
• 2012/04/17 Problem with aclocal rajeshwari b
• 2012/04/17 [no subject] rajeshwari b
• 2012/04/12 Re: Removal of double check from AC_CHECK_HEADER (was Re: AC_INCLUDES_DEFAULT does not need to probe...) Paul Eggert
• 2012/04/12 Re: socket code on Windows (was: AC_INCLUDES_DEFAULT does not need to probe for headers that are part of C89 or POSIX.1 anymore) Zack Weinberg
• 2012/04/12 socket code on Windows (was: AC_INCLUDES_DEFAULT does not need to probe for headers that are part of C89 or POSIX.1 anymore) Russ Allbery
• 2012/04/12 Removal of double check from AC_CHECK_HEADER (was Re: AC_INCLUDES_DEFAULT does not need to probe...) Zack Weinberg
• 2012/04/09 Installing gcc on Mac OS X Asad, Randa (asadrs)
• 2012/04/07 [sr #107986] autoconf should reject or specifically warn about obviously wrong configure.ac files David A. Wheeler
• 2012/04/04 Re: AC_INCLUDES_DEFAULT does not need to probe for headers that are part of C89 or POSIX.1 anymore Paul Eggert
• 2012/04/04 Re: AC_INCLUDES_DEFAULT does not need to probe for headers that are part of C89 or POSIX.1 anymore Zack Weinberg
• 2012/04/04 Re: AC_INCLUDES_DEFAULT does not need to probe for headers that are part of C89 or POSIX.1 anymore Russ Allbery
• 2012/04/04 Re: AC_INCLUDES_DEFAULT does not need to probe for headers that are part of C89 or POSIX.1 anymore Zack Weinberg

• Earlier messages
• Later messages