bug-autoconf  

Messages by Date

• 2013/01/06 autoreconf doesn't honor m4_include Werner LEMBERG
• 2013/01/05 Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.69.60-5766] testsuite: 132 failed Joshua C.
• 2013/01/04 Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.69.60-5766] testsuite: 132 failed Eric Blake
• 2013/01/04 Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.69.60-5766] testsuite: 132 failed Joshua C.
• 2013/01/03 Re: bug#13349: Re-execute with the "correct" make implementation Stefano Lattarini
• 2013/01/03 Re: Re-execute with the "correct" make implementation Eric Blake
• 2013/01/03 [PATCH] AT_TESTED: fix regression in word splitting Eric Blake
• 2013/01/03 Re: bug#13349: Re-execute with the "correct" make implementation Stefano Lattarini
• 2013/01/03 Re: [PATCH] docs: mention $MAKE during configure Stefano Lattarini
• 2013/01/03 Re: Re-execute with the "correct" make implementation Stefano Lattarini
• 2013/01/03 Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.69.59-adc84] testsuite: 132 355 failed Eric Blake
• 2013/01/03 Re: bug#13349: Re-execute with the "correct" make implementation Bob Friesenhahn
• 2013/01/03 Re: Re-execute with the "correct" make implementation Eric Blake
• 2013/01/03 Re: bug#13349: Re-execute with the "correct" make implementation Stefano Lattarini
• 2013/01/03 Re: Re-execute with the "correct" make implementation Nick Bowler
• 2013/01/03 Re: [PATCH] docs: mention $MAKE during configure Eric Blake
• 2013/01/03 Re: [PATCH] docs: mention $MAKE during configure Stefano Lattarini
• 2013/01/03 Re-execute with the "correct" make implementation Stefano Lattarini
• 2013/01/03 [PATCH] docs: mention $MAKE during configure Eric Blake
• 2013/01/03 Re: bug#13349: [IMPORTANT] Could we just assuming support for make recursive variable expansion unconditionally? Eric Blake
• 2013/01/03 Re: bug#13349: [IMPORTANT] Could we just assuming support for make recursive variable expansion unconditionally? Stefano Lattarini
• 2013/01/03 Re: bug#13349: [IMPORTANT] Could we just assuming support for make recursive variable expansion unconditionally? Eric Blake
• 2013/01/02 Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.69.60-5766] testsuite: 132 failed Joshua C.
• 2013/01/02 Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.69.60-5766] testsuite: 132 failed Eric Blake
• 2013/01/02 [GNU Autoconf 2.69.60-5766] testsuite: 132 failed Joshua C.
• 2013/01/02 Re: error with autoconf 2.69 and gccgo (error: cannot run Go compiled programs.) Stefano Lattarini
• 2013/01/02 Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.69.59-adc84] testsuite: 132 355 failed Stefano Lattarini
• 2013/01/02 error with autoconf 2.69 and gccgo (error: cannot run Go compiled programs.) Markus Rothe
• 2013/01/02 Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.69.59-adc84] testsuite: 132 355 failed Eric Blake
• 2013/01/02 Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.69.59-adc84] testsuite: 132 355 failed Stefano Lattarini
• 2013/01/01 Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.69.59-adc84] testsuite: 132 355 failed Stefano Lattarini
• 2012/12/31 Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.69.59-adc84] testsuite: 132 355 failed Eric Blake
• 2012/12/28 Autotest: --output Akim Demaille
• 2012/12/24 Re: Making variably-named .in files work with config.status Reuben Thomas
• 2012/12/24 Re: Making variably-named .in files work with config.status Nick Bowler
• 2012/12/23 Making variably-named .in files work with config.status Reuben Thomas
• 2012/12/10 Re: AC_PROG_CC_C99 fails when configure with CFLAGS="-Werror -Wall" Paul Eggert
• 2012/12/10 Re: AC_PROG_CC_C99 fails when configure with CFLAGS="-Werror -Wall" Eric Blake
• 2012/12/10 AC_PROG_CC_C99 fails when configure with CFLAGS="-Werror -Wall" ChangZhuo Chen
• 2012/11/24 Re: Please make the Autoconf manual less vague and add more examples Stefano Lattarini
• 2012/11/24 Please make the Autoconf manual less vague and add more examples Eli Zaretskii
• 2012/11/22 Autoconf cannot handle names of m4 builtins in AC_INIT's first argument correctly Stefano Lattarini
• 2012/11/18 [sr #108182] [doc] Clarification for behaviour of AC_CHECK_FILES Christophe CURIS
• 2012/11/17 [sr #108182] [doc] Clarification for behaviour of AC_CHECK_FILES Paul Eggert
• 2012/11/17 [sr #108182] [doc] Clarification for behaviour of AC_CHECK_FILES Christophe CURIS
• 2012/11/10 Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.69] testsuite: 264 271 286 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 failed Paul Eggert
• 2012/11/09 [GNU Autoconf 2.69] testsuite: 264 271 286 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 failed Dennis Clarke
• 2012/10/27 Test 349 "Go" failed with gccgo 4.7.1, with latest autoconf from master Stefano Lattarini
• 2012/10/26 2.69: missing "checking for C++ compiler" Akim Demaille
• 2012/10/25 Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.69] 141 suite failed Adrian Bunk
• 2012/10/25 2.69: Autotest's AT_ARG_OPTION does not fill --help properly Akim Demaille
• 2012/10/23 Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.69] 141 suite failed Vladimir Kraljević
• 2012/10/23 Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.69] 141 suite failed Eric Blake
• 2012/10/16 Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.69.38-b038] testsuite: 299 300 302 failed Paul Eggert
• 2012/10/16 Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.69.38-b038] testsuite: 299 300 302 failed Eric Blake
• 2012/10/16 [GNU Autoconf 2.69.38-b038] testsuite: 299 300 302 failed Stefano Lattarini
• 2012/10/12 Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.69.35-c8d2] testsuite: 299 300 302 failed Adrian Bunk
• 2012/10/08 Re: Autoconf example scripts for site defaults Eric Blake
• 2012/10/02 Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Adrian Bunk
• 2012/10/02 Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Peter Rosin
• 2012/10/02 Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Adrian Bunk
• 2012/10/01 Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Paul Eggert
• 2012/10/01 Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Adrian Bunk
• 2012/10/01 Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Paul Eggert
• 2012/10/01 Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Adrian Bunk
• 2012/09/28 Re: Fortran library finding bug GNU Autoconf Autoconf 2.61 (and others) Eric Blake
• 2012/09/28 Fortran library finding bug GNU Autoconf Autoconf 2.61 (and others) Marc W. Mengel
• 2012/09/28 Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Paul Eggert
• 2012/09/28 Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Adrian Bunk
• 2012/09/28 Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Andrew W. Nosenko
• 2012/09/28 Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Adrian Bunk
• 2012/09/28 Re: [sr #108144] ./configure could recommend packages to install through local package manager Adrian Bunk
• 2012/09/28 Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Adrian Bunk
• 2012/09/27 Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Paul Eggert
• 2012/09/27 Re: [sr #108144] ./configure could recommend packages to install through local package manager Paul Eggert
• 2012/09/27 Re: [sr #108144] ./configure could recommend packages to install through local package manager Adrian Bunk
• 2012/09/27 Re: [sr #108144] ./configure could recommend packages to install through local package manager Paul Eggert
• 2012/09/27 [sr #108144] ./configure could recommend packages to install through local package manager Eric Blake
• 2012/09/27 [sr #108144] ./configure could recommend packages to install through local package manager Andrew Engelbrecht
• 2012/09/27 Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Adrian Bunk
• 2012/09/27 Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Paul Eggert
• 2012/09/27 Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Adrian Bunk
• 2012/09/26 Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Paul Eggert
• 2012/09/26 Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Adrian Bunk
• 2012/09/26 Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Paul Eggert
• 2012/09/26 Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Adrian Bunk
• 2012/09/25 Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Paul Eggert
• 2012/09/25 Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Adrian Bunk
• 2012/09/25 Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Paul Eggert
• 2012/09/25 Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Adrian Bunk
• 2012/09/25 Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Eric Blake
• 2012/09/25 Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Adrian Bunk
• 2012/09/25 Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Paul Eggert
• 2012/09/25 Re: bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Adrian Bunk
• 2012/09/24 Re: Documentation and AC_DEFINE/AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED Eric Blake
• 2012/09/23 Re: AC_PROG_CC_* shouldn't append multiple options Andrew W. Nosenko
• 2012/09/23 Re: Wrong AC_PROG_LN_S test on MSYS with 2.68 Adrian Bunk
• 2012/09/23 Re: AC_PROG_CC_* shouldn't append multiple options Adrian Bunk
• 2012/09/22 Re: Documentation and AC_DEFINE/AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED Paul Eggert
• 2012/09/22 Wrong AC_PROG_LN_S test on MSYS with 2.68 daniel . f . starke
• 2012/09/22 Documentation and AC_DEFINE/AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED Brad Smith
• 2012/09/22 Re: [PATCH] AC_PROG_CC_C11: new macro, which AC_PROG_CC_STDC now defaults to Jim Meyering
• 2012/09/22 Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.69.23-388d] testsuite: 35 failed (autom4te preselections) Stefano Lattarini
• 2012/09/21 Re: [PATCH] AC_PROG_CC_C11: new macro, which AC_PROG_CC_STDC now defaults to Paul Eggert
• 2012/09/21 Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.69.23-388d] testsuite: 35 failed (autom4te preselections) Eric Blake
• 2012/09/21 Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.69.23-388d] testsuite: 35 failed (autom4te preselections) Stefano Lattarini
• 2012/09/21 Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.69.23-388d] testsuite: 35 failed (autom4te preselections) Eric Blake
• 2012/09/21 Re: AC_PROG_CC_* shouldn't append multiple options Andrew W. Nosenko
• 2012/09/21 Re: AC_PROG_CC_* shouldn't append multiple options Adrian Bunk
• 2012/09/21 Re: AC_PROG_CC_* shouldn't append multiple options Andrew W. Nosenko
• 2012/09/21 Re: AC_PROG_CC_* shouldn't append multiple options Adrian Bunk
• 2012/09/21 [GNU Autoconf 2.69.23-388d] testsuite: 35 failed (autom4te preselections) Stefano Lattarini
• 2012/09/21 Re: AC_PROG_CC_* shouldn't append multiple options Adrian Bunk
• 2012/09/21 Re: AC_PROG_CC_* shouldn't append multiple options Adrian Bunk
• 2012/09/21 Re: AC_PROG_CC_* shouldn't append multiple options Andrew W. Nosenko
• 2012/09/20 Re: AC_PROG_CC_* shouldn't append multiple options Paul Eggert
• 2012/09/20 Re: AC_PROG_CC_* shouldn't append multiple options Paul Eggert
• 2012/09/20 AC_PROG_CC_* shouldn't append multiple options Adrian Bunk
• 2012/09/20 bug: "gcc -std=gnu99" passes AC_PROG_CC_C11 Adrian Bunk
• 2012/09/15 Re: autoconf-2.69 pkgsrc patch Thomas Klausner
• 2012/09/14 Re: autoconf-2.69 pkgsrc patch Eric Blake
• 2012/09/14 autoconf-2.69 pkgsrc patch Thomas Klausner
• 2012/09/06 Re: AC_CHECK_ALIGNOF cross-compile detection fails with newer gcc and offsetof fallback Paul Eggert
• 2012/09/06 Re: AC_CHECK_ALIGNOF cross-compile detection fails with newer gcc and offsetof fallback Eric Blake
• 2012/09/06 AC_CHECK_ALIGNOF cross-compile detection fails with newer gcc and offsetof fallback Mike Frysinger
• 2012/09/04 Fink install of 2.69-1 on Mac OS X v 10.5.8, Xcode 3.1.4 Bill Nelson
• 2012/08/15 Re: AC_SUBST is temperamental in expanding its first argument. Eric Blake
• 2012/08/15 AC_SUBST is temperamental in expanding its first argument. Nick Bowler
• 2012/08/07 Re: Autoconf AC_CHECK_SIZEOF always 0 on CentOS Eric Blake
• 2012/08/07 Re: Autoconf AC_CHECK_SIZEOF always 0 on CentOS Inge Henriksen
• 2012/08/07 Re: Autoconf AC_CHECK_SIZEOF always 0 on CentOS Eric Blake
• 2012/08/07 Autoconf AC_CHECK_SIZEOF always 0 on CentOS Inge Henriksen
• 2012/08/07 Re: [FYI] {maint} tests: avoid spurious failure of 't/uninstall-fail.sh' on OpenIndiana Stefano Lattarini
• 2012/08/06 Re: Folder naming bug. Eric Blake
• 2012/08/06 Re: [FYI] {maint} tests: avoid spurious failure of 't/uninstall-fail.sh' on OpenIndiana Eric Blake
• 2012/08/01 Re: ampersand in path name Eric Blake
• 2012/07/31 ampersand in path name K Richard Pixley
• 2012/07/26 Re: ax_cxx_gcc_abi_demangle.m4: missing header Eric Blake
• 2012/07/26 ax_cxx_gcc_abi_demangle.m4: missing header Andriy Gapon
• 2012/07/25 Re: test -z and test -n DESTDIR support James Smith
• 2012/07/25 Re: fail to run aclocal Eric Blake
• 2012/07/25 fail to run aclocal Xuanye An
• 2012/07/25 Re: test -z and test -n DESTDIR support Stefano Lattarini
• 2012/07/25 Re: test -z and test -n DESTDIR support Eric Blake
• 2012/07/24 test -z and test -n DESTDIR support James Smith
• 2012/07/23 Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Karl Berry
• 2012/07/23 Re: Possible typo in Autoconf manual Eric Blake
• 2012/07/21 Possible typo in Autoconf manual Edward Chernenko
• 2012/07/21 [sr #108092] AC_PROG_GREP can select /usr/xpg4/bin/grep under Solaris 9 but it doesn't support long lines Yann Rouillard
• 2012/07/21 Re: "-v" in CFLAGS breaks autoconf -fPIC and some other tests Václav Zeman
• 2012/07/21 Autoconf testsuite failure (likely spurious) with the development version of Automake Stefano Lattarini
• 2012/07/21 Re: "-v" in CFLAGS breaks autoconf -fPIC and some other tests Mike Frysinger
• 2012/07/21 "-v" in CFLAGS breaks autoconf -fPIC and some other tests Knut Petersen
• 2012/07/19 Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Patrice Dumas
• 2012/07/19 Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Eli Zaretskii
• 2012/07/19 Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Patrice Dumas
• 2012/07/19 Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Patrice Dumas
• 2012/07/18 Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Stefano Lattarini
• 2012/07/18 Re: IFS clobbering Eric Blake
• 2012/07/18 Re: IFS clobbering Andreas Schwab
• 2012/07/18 Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Eric Blake
• 2012/07/18 Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Eric Blake
• 2012/07/18 Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Eli Zaretskii
• 2012/07/18 Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Eric Blake
• 2012/07/18 Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Patrice Dumas
• 2012/07/18 Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Eli Zaretskii
• 2012/07/18 Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Eli Zaretskii
• 2012/07/18 Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Patrice Dumas
• 2012/07/18 Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Patrice Dumas
• 2012/07/18 Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Eli Zaretskii
• 2012/07/18 Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Patrice Dumas
• 2012/07/18 Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Patrice Dumas
• 2012/07/17 Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Eric Blake
• 2012/07/17 Re: Fwd: Re: bug version number of autoconf gilles . charabot
• 2012/07/17 Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Eli Zaretskii
• 2012/07/17 Re: Fwd: Re: bug version number of autoconf Eric Blake
• 2012/07/17 Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Eric Blake
• 2012/07/17 Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Patrice Dumas
• 2012/07/17 Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Eli Zaretskii
• 2012/07/17 Re: bug version bug-autoconf Eric Blake
• 2012/07/17 bug version bug-autoconf gilles . charabot
• 2012/07/17 Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Patrice Dumas
• 2012/07/16 Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Eli Zaretskii
• 2012/07/16 Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Patrice Dumas
• 2012/07/16 CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git) Stefano Lattarini
• 2012/07/15 [GNU Autoconf 2.69] testsuite: 270 273 274 276 277 278 279 ... Perry Smith
• 2012/07/13 Re: [PATCH] m4sh: avoid // issues in _AS_PATH_WALK Eric Blake
• 2012/07/13 Re: [PATCH] m4sh: avoid // issues in _AS_PATH_WALK Paul Eggert
• 2012/07/13 [PATCH] m4sh: avoid // issues in _AS_PATH_WALK Eric Blake
• 2012/07/13 Re: test -f //dot Eric Blake
• 2012/07/04 Re: [PATCH 1/2] AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIR: accept more than one argument Stefano Lattarini
• 2012/07/04 Re: [PATCH 1/2] AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIR: accept more than one argument Stefano Lattarini
• 2012/07/04 Re: [PATCH 1/2] AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIR: accept more than one argument Stefano Lattarini
• 2012/07/04 Re: [PATCH 1/2] AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIR: accept more than one argument Eric Blake
• 2012/07/04 Re: [PATCH 1/2] AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIR: accept more than one argument Eric Blake
• 2012/07/04 [PATCH 1/2] AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIR: accept more than one argument Stefano Lattarini
• 2012/07/04 [PATCH 2/2] docs: ACLOCAL_AMFLAGS will become obsolescent in Automake 1.13 Stefano Lattarini
• 2012/07/04 Re: [PATCH] {master} aclocal: deprecate ACLOCAL_AMFLAGS, trace AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIR instead Stefano Lattarini
• 2012/06/30 Re: Autoconf should allow the developer to require a POSIX shell Paul Eggert
• 2012/06/28 Autoconf should allow the developer to require a POSIX shell Stefano Lattarini

• Earlier messages
• Later messages