Andrew Crystall wrote:
> On 12 Oct 2008 at 23:27, xponentrob wrote:
>> From: "Andrew Crystall"
>>> Also, there's a major problem with calling the EM Engine, as it
>>> stands, entirely bogus. Because there's a demonstration version the
>>> scientists behind it have built which generates thrust.
>>>
>>> I haven't seen any good explinations for that between "It can't
>>> happen" and "It's an EM Engine".
>>>
>> Got any evidence it actually works?
>> I can't find any.
>
> Beyond the fact it actually generates thrust, you mean?
Is this a fact? As in, has it been confirmed by independent experiments
that there is actual thrust by the mechanism claimed? Remember the "cold
fusion" mentioned in the article. Those scientists also had a
demonstration version that generated heat.
/c
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
