On 12 Oct 2008 at 12:00, Rceeberger wrote: > http://chronicle.com/free/v49/i21/21b02001.htm > *********************************************************************************
The article's from 1993. Also, there's a major problem with calling the EM Engine, as it stands, entirely bogus. Because there's a demonstration version the scientists behind it have built which generates thrust. I haven't seen any good explinations for that between "It can't happen" and "It's an EM Engine". AndrewC Dawn Falcon _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
