On 9/2/08, William T Goodall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just like how without an external yardstick there is no way to call > Uwe Boll's _BloodRayne_ better than Shakespeare's _Hamlet_. Because if > it's all just opinions they are all equally valid and there is no way > to call one better than the other?
That's absolutely correct. Some people think that the length of fight scenes is the ultimate guage of how good a martial arts movie is. Some say it's a matter of how realistic the martial arts are. Some say that script and cinematography are important factors in martial arts films, some say script and cinematography are irrelevant. While I personally doubt I would like the script for _BloodRayne_ as much as I like the script for _Hamlet_, I'm also pretty sure that there have been performances of _Hamlet_ that I would not enjoy as much as the movie _BloodRayne_. And just for the record, I thought the movie _BloodRayne_ was pretty awful. -- Mauro Diotallevi "The number you have dialed is imaginary. Please rotate your phone 90 degrees and try again." _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
