> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Robert Seeberger > Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 8:10 PM > To: Killer Bs Discussion > Subject: Re: Physics Prof Finds Thermate in WTC Physical Samples > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Dan Minette" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "'Killer Bs Discussion'" <[email protected]> > Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 2:35 PM > Subject: RE: Physics Prof Finds Thermate in WTC Physical Samples > > > > > > So, I think we've gotten to the point where, in order to still say > > "I cannot > > accept" the conventional explanation, then you will have to reject > > my basic > > physics argument. I'd be very interested to see what flaws you > > might see in > > this argument. > > > > OK<G>, I'll bite on this one.<G> > > The WTC towers were designed to withstand an impact by a 707 fully > loaded with 23,000 gallons of fuel, yet the planes that actually hit > them had less than half that amount (10,000 gallons) on board and much > of that was expelled in the fireball associated with the impact.
There is a very simple answer for this, as I guess you know. When designing a fail-safe system, one works through scenarios....but there can be scenarios that one has not thought of. The building did withstand the impact of the plane, itself. But, it did not survive everything that came with the impact. Would you like to see exactly what analysis was done concerning a 707 impact? I've got a beer that says that the airplane impact analysis before the collapse was rather limited compared to the after-the-fact analysis. Anyways, I actually curious to see how it was "impossible" for the collapse to be as fast as it was. Dan M. _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
