> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Gibson Jonathan
> Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2006 1:18 PM
> To: Killer Bs Discussion
> Subject: Re: Physics Prof Finds Thermate in WTC Physical Samples
> 
> 
> I have yet to see a model - or even discussion - on how such metal is a
> renowned heat wick and just how this would have mitigated total
> systemic collapse... unless the argument is that this apparently
> minimal heat was X-ferred down the entire skeleton structure... leading
> to the "Soft Butter" support member lack of resistance that allowed the
> entire building to fall at damn-near free-fall speeds - all at once.
> Seems a stretch.

As Charlie pointed out, it wasn't all at once.  Floor by floor, it
collapsed, from multiple shocks.  I discussed the physics of this at some
length in an earlier post. 

The essence of what I am arguing is that the time to build the g forces
necessary for the falling mass of floors X+1 to 110+ to build up sufficient
g forces to break though floor X is very short....say ~10msec.  That is not
surprising.  If it is traveling at only 100 feet/sec, then this is the time
it takes to travel 1 foot.  The floor has to give 1 foot, fairly uniformly,
or break in 10 msec.**  

To move 1 foot in 10 msec, it has to be accelerated at a rate of 8 g's.
There is some resistance to this, of course, so the force of the falling
upper stories has to be greater than 8 g's.  I'd have to look at
stress-strain curves and the building structure to give a good number, but I
have a hard time seeing the lower floors not breaking before they are
displaced 1 foot downwards.  Shear, as Charlie suggested, looks like a very
good candidate for the failure mechanism to me.

Since this is the second time I explained this, I get the feeling that I'm
not being as clear as I might wish.  It would be helpful for you to tell me
what about the shock wave propagation that I describe is troublesome for
you.

Dan M. 

** Well, the falling mass could also be squeezed together, with the bottom
part decelerating at a higher rate than the top part. But, this doesn't buy
a whole lot of time before the forces needed for further compaction are
multiple g's.  Not a whole lot would probably add to one or two hundred
msec. 


_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to