On 5/12/06, Charlie Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 12/05/2006, at 5:16 PM, Nick Arnett wrote: > On 5/11/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> On the other hand the notion that evolution has no emprical >> evidence is >> simply untrue. > > > That's hardly the same as saying there is no direct evidence. What > I meant, > if it wasn't clear, is that nobody was observing evolution over the > last few > million years. True, though somewhat trivial. Evidence and observation are not always the same.
"Evidence" and "direct evidence" are not always the same. Nick -- Nick Arnett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Messages: 408-904-7198 _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
