On 5/11/06, Charlie Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 11/05/2006, at 5:45 PM, Nick Arnett wrote: > Much the same could be > said of evolution -- we have very little direct evidence, *hiss* ;) We have a LOT of direct evidence. The fossil record. Genetic drift, actual speciation events.
We apparently define "direct evidence" differently. It's just wrong to say there's little direct evidence, sorry. <sarcasm>Well, thank you for straightening me out on that. Now would you please introduce me to the people who have directly observed evolution?</sarcasm> This doesn't count: http://www.darwinawards.com/ Bacterial adaptation almost does. Nick -- Nick Arnett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Messages: 408-904-7198 _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
