In a message dated 12/24/2003 4:49:12 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> That would be the CIA agent who just posed in Vanity > Fair, and the Halliburton that is operating at profit > margins _below_ its national average for its > operations in Iraq? She posed after she was outed. Forget about her; what about the person who outed her. Isn't that a crime? Isn'/t the right very big on crimes? Perjury in a private law suit is grounds for removal from office but commiting the crime of compromising national security is ok because the person subsquently poses for Vanity Fair? Stay on topic. What she does now is not the issue. That is not the crime. As to Halliburton. Are you really claiming that they will lose money on this deal? And once again even if true so what? Your arguement comes down to forgiving a thief because he had no money. If Halliburton made a bad deal that is their problem. We live in a free market economy. They took the risk. If they really lose money then that is their problem because if they make money they get to keep it. We call that capitalism. Their actions were on their face criminal and criminal of the worst type. War profiteering. _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
