In a message dated 12/23/2003 11:43:21 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
writes:

> Oh I see, Brad, the side with the "real arguments" is the side which argued
> that "the Right does not police their own very well" on the basis of Rush
> Limbaugh arguing that State of Florida prosecutors did not properly follow
> the laws of Florida in asking for his private medical 
> records to be unsealed.

Your defense of Rush is extraordinarly concrete. I am always amazed when you cannot 
admit that anything done by a member of the right is wrong. Rush admitted to his 
problem only after it became the subject of an investigation. He couldn't deny it. He 
went into a celebrity rehab center. Don Imus (who knows of such things) scolded Rush 
for not entering a serious rehab facility. I am always very suspicious of the addicted 
to pain killers because of my back pain arguement. Someone with his resources could 
have received help to kick this addiction at any time. He got his drugs illegally 
precisely so he could continue to use them without having to see a doctor. In short 
his admission was by necessity his explanation rings false and his rehab should be 
viewed with skeptism. By the way you should know that Alan Dershowitz has said that he 
should not be prosecuted since since this is not standard practice. Imagine that, a 
card carrying liberal saying that on principle that Rush should not be prosecuted. 
Maybe you could learn something Alan
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to