On Sat, Jul 19, 2003 at 09:31:35PM +0530, Ritu wrote: > Um, yes. However, they were not studying precognition but whether the > human soul exists.
Irrelevant to my point. For a reliable experiment, the tests really need to be "double-blind" here. That means neither the people conducting the tests nor the people being tested no the answers. Otherwise there are just so many ways that people can fool themselves. > Btw, the method that you outlined, wasn't something similar undertaken > to prove the veracity of the seers of Kell? I have no idea what you are referring to. But if there were a repeatable experiment that verified that "seers" could predict the future, I am confident it would be famous quickly and I would know about it. So *I* predict that no one has "proved" that seers can predict the future. -- "Erik Reuter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.erikreuter.net/ _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
