Erik Reuter wrote: > A better study might look for predictions or observations by such > patients that could not possibly have been known beforehand BY ANYONE > (at least, anyone not divine or whatever).
<snippage> Um, yes. However, they were not studying precognition but whether the human soul exists. Basically, they were looking for a non-corporeal entity that still retains the personality of the individual. So they went looking in the post-operative ward, talking to people who had flat-lined on the operating table, or something like that. I seem to recall something about objects being hidden around the operating room... Let me try and search out the url for the paper they published. It might take a while as the monsoons have rendered my net connection abysmal. The speeds these days are 2.4 kbps to 9.7 kbps. > if the effect was real, > it is likely someone WOULD HAVE done such a definitive > experiment, since > they would have been naturally led that way when their first tentative > experiments were frequently successful. Last I heard, this was the point they were at. They were [cardiac?] surgeons who had conducted enough initial experiments to seriously wish to study this further. Btw, the method that you outlined, wasn't something similar undertaken to prove the veracity of the seers of Kell? Ritu _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
