The article which I posted contained NO incorrect information.
So your article on a study which says humans have little or no ability to detect pheromones is better than my article on a study which contradicts that, because in your scientifically informed opinion, the results from the study I quoted are a "statistical bump," even though they were not considered a statistical bump by the editorial board of the journal in which the study was published?
I'll trust the scientific opinion of the editorial board of the Journal of Biology and Reproduction over your scientific opinion in this case. I think they've probably earned that trust more than you.
I have no interest in pursuing this discussion further.
Reggie Bautista
_________________________________________________________________
The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
_______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
