On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 11:20:03AM -0700, Chad Cooper wrote:
> I have a theory (which of course would not meet Erik's stringent
> standard for what is required to formulate a theory)
Geez, Chad, I didn't mean to make you so paranoid! I don't have any
problem with something stated like that ("I have a theory..."). No
stringent requirements. My problem is when false knowledge is presented
authoritatively as FACT (not just "a theory"). (And I am not implying
that your theory is wrong, I actually don't have much opinion on it,
although it sounds possible)
--
"Erik Reuter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.erikreuter.net/
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
