----- Original Message ----- From: "Erik Reuter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, March 23, 2003 8:17 PM Subject: Re: Incest
> On Sun, Mar 23, 2003 at 08:10:14PM -0600, Robert Seeberger wrote: > > > From: "Erik Reuter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > I don't think it is worthwhile to speculate on all the indirect, > > > delayed possibilities that could conceivably occur. If you did, you > > > would never have sex at all since that is always a possibility, > > > family member or totally un-related person. Safer just to be friends > > > if you think about it too much... > > > > Sex with cousins is likely OK and beyond cousins is always acceptable. > > Are you saying you have no idea who your parents, brothers and > > sisters, nieces and nephews are? > > You haven't understood what I wrote. If you meet an unrelated girl (who > you 100% know is not related), and you have sex with her, there could be > lots of unforseen complications. You would have been safer to just be > platonic friends. > > > Unfortunately there is a large body of work over many years that > > belies your argument. > > What argument of mine, specifically, is belied? > > > Gonna argue for creationism next? <G> > > Based on a large body of evidence over several years, I wouldn't put it > past you to misinterpret what I said so badly that you thought I was. > > > On the contrary, I know from my personal experiance dealing with > > my ex-wife and all the problems she had, that Dan is well versed, > > although not expert, in these matters. > > On the contrary, I know from personal experience that Dan has some > trouble discussing the subject objectively. How many times have you seen > him send someone a 1-line response telling them how ignorant they are, > on other subjects? > > > Having an emotional reaction does not in any way imply ignorance. > > You, on the other hand, appear to have trouble with logic or reading > comprehension much of the time. Since when does lack of objectivity > equate to ignorance? I did not say he was ignorant. > > > Having no emotional reaction does imply something though. > > Yes, that it is possible for man to suppress irrational instincts and > discuss something rationally rather than behaving like animals who are > subject only to their impulses. You sure you are not a Scientologist? xponent Questions Maru rob Aint nothin' gonna change If you can go away Im just gonna stay here and always be the same _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
