----- Original Message ----- From: "Erik Reuter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, March 23, 2003 7:32 PM Subject: Re: Incest
> On Sun, Mar 23, 2003 at 07:32:39PM -0600, Robert Seeberger wrote: > > > No, Dan is correct. I suggest that you have not correctly assessed > > all the parameters involved in incest or you need to qualify your > > statement. > > No, you are both wrong. > > I did qualify it. I explained what I meant by "consensual" and I said > "direct harm". I did NOT say that sex between a parent and a child > caused no harm, although you are reacting as if I did. If you mean immediate harm, I would agree, but since the "direct" relationship between the individuals will suffer in the long term, I would still disagree with your statement. A statement such as that cannot help but be misleading since it involves such a loaded subject. xponent Again Maru rob Aint nothin' gonna change If you can go away Im just gonna stay here and always be the same _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
