LGTM1

On Monday, May 12, 2025 at 3:00:13 PM UTC-7 stev...@microsoft.com wrote:

> Yes, thanks for the reminder. This is my first Intent to Ship so will note 
> this for future ones! 
>
> On Monday, May 12, 2025 at 2:32:23 PM UTC-7 mike...@chromium.org wrote:
>
>> Before continuing the review, could you please request all the privacy, 
>> security, enterprise, etc bits in the chromestatus entry?
>> On 5/12/25 2:32 PM, 'Steven Wei' via blink-dev wrote:
>>
>> domenic@ found the place in HTML spec that already mentioned this header 
>> for prefetch:  Fetch Standard 
>> <https://fetch.spec.whatwg.org/#:~:text=If%20httpRequest%E2%80%99s%20initiator%20is%20%22prefetch%22%2C%20then%20set%20a%20structured%20field%20value%20given%20(%60Sec%2DPurpose%60%2C%20the%20token%20prefetch)%20in%20httpRequest%E2%80%99s%20header%20list>
>>  
>>
>> Positive for Mozilla as they've already mainly migrated to using the 
>> header,
>> and not planned for Webkit and they don't support rel=prefetch.
>>
>> On Monday, May 12, 2025 at 7:45:16 AM UTC-7 Steven Wei wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks! Added an issue to whatwg/html repo:  Can we include what 
>>> header(s) get sent with link type prefetch? · Issue #11294 · whatwg/html 
>>> <https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/11294>
>>> Also, I don't think Safari supports <link rel=prefetch>.
>>>
>>> Also, started vendor position requests:
>>> Mozilla: Send Sec-Purpose header for link type prefetch (rel=prefetch) 
>>> · Issue #1228 · mozilla/standards-positions 
>>> <https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/1228>
>>> Webkit:  Send Sec-Purpose header for link type prefetch (rel=prefetch) 
>>> · Issue #493 · WebKit/standards-positions 
>>> <https://github.com/WebKit/standards-positions/issues/493>
>>>
>>> On Thursday, May 8, 2025 at 2:30:17 PM UTC-7 yoav...@chromium.org wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, May 8, 2025 at 11:11 PM Chromestatus <
>>> ad...@cr-status.appspotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Contact emails stev...@microsoft.com 
>>>
>>> Explainer https://github.com/w3c/resource-hints/issues/74 
>>>
>>> Specification 
>>> https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/6334746
>>>
>>>
>>> That's not a specification. Is it possible to file an issue on HTML and 
>>> try to bake that into the standard? 
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Summary 
>>>
>>> Chrome currently passes both 'Purpose: prefetch' and 'Sec-Purpose: 
>>> prefetch' headers as part of prefetch through speculation rules. However, 
>>> only 'Purpose: prefetch' is passed with <link rel=prefetch>. We plan to 
>>> standardize this header for both speculation rules and <link rel=prefetch> 
>>> by adding 'Sec-Purpose: prefetch' header to the latter. Future work will 
>>> involve stop sending 'Purpose: prefetch' for prefetches, prerenders, etc.
>>>
>>>
>>> Blink component Blink>Loader 
>>> <https://issues.chromium.org/issues?q=customfield1222907:%22Blink%3ELoader%22>
>>>  
>>>
>>> TAG review Not filed as this is a minor change of unspec'ed UA behavior 
>>> for an existing feature. (Can start a review if recommended) 
>>>
>>> TAG review status Pending 
>>>
>>> Risks 
>>>
>>>
>>> Interoperability and Compatibility 
>>>
>>> As commented at notes on Firefox and Safari, each browser uses 
>>> non-standardized header name that is not aligned with CORS spec. This 
>>> change will introduce better interoperability and compatibility for a long 
>>> term.
>>>
>>>
>>> *Gecko*: No signal Firefox has sent ‘X-moz: prefetch’. 
>>>
>>> *WebKit*: No signal Safari has sent 'Purpose: prefetch' but changed to 
>>> use 'X-Purpose: preview'.
>>>
>>>
>>> Can you open vendor position requests and try to get them on board this 
>>> change?
>>>
>>> Also, does Safari support <link rel=prefeftch>? Or is that for URL bar 
>>> driven prefetches? 
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *Web developers*: No signals
>>>
>>>
>>> With my web developer hat on, these different headers are definitely a 
>>> hurdle and can cause some prefetches to be missed.
>>>  
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *Other signals*: 
>>>
>>> WebView application risks 
>>>
>>> Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such 
>>> that it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based applications?
>>>
>>> None
>>>
>>>
>>> Debuggability 
>>>
>>> Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms (Windows, Mac, 
>>> Linux, ChromeOS, Android, and Android WebView)? No 
>>>
>>> Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests 
>>> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>
>>> ? No 
>>>
>>> Plan to add a new test.
>>>
>>>
>>> Flag name on about://flags None 
>>>
>>> Finch feature name None 
>>>
>>> Non-finch justification None 
>>>
>>> Rollout plan Will ship enabled for all users 
>>>
>>> Requires code in //chrome? False 
>>>
>>> Tracking bug https://issues.chromium.org/issues/40236973 
>>>
>>> Estimated milestones 
>>>
>>> No milestones specified
>>>
>>>
>>> Anticipated spec changes 
>>>
>>> Open questions about a feature may be a source of future web compat or 
>>> interop issues. Please list open issues (e.g. links to known github issues 
>>> in the project for the feature specification) whose resolution may 
>>> introduce web compat/interop risk (e.g., changing to naming or structure of 
>>> the API in a non-backward-compatible way).
>>> None 
>>>
>>> Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status 
>>> https://chromestatus.com/feature/6247959677108224?gate=4656924191096832 
>>>
>>> Links to previous Intent discussions Intent to Prototype: 
>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/680fb6c9.050a0220.1699c.03f6.GAE%40google.com
>>>  
>>>
>>>
>>> This intent message was generated by Chrome Platform Status 
>>> <https://chromestatus.com>. 
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>> an email to blink-dev+...@chromium.org.
>>> To view this discussion visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/681d1e1b.050a0220.d6048.0024.GAE%40google.com
>>>  
>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/681d1e1b.050a0220.d6048.0024.GAE%40google.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>> .
>>>
>>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "blink-dev" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to blink-dev+...@chromium.org.
>>
>> To view this discussion visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/70f2338a-168f-4747-be74-2784fb90f436n%40chromium.org
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/70f2338a-168f-4747-be74-2784fb90f436n%40chromium.org?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/0414a26a-1c5a-431c-98c3-c2fbe6c04fa1n%40chromium.org.

Reply via email to