On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 8:36 PM, Luke Dashjr <l...@dashjr.org> wrote: > Ok, then my point is that "signature malleability" is not particularly > problematic or interesting alone, and the only way to get a practically-useful > solution, is to address all kinds of malleability.
I disagree. Segregated witnesses, for example, doesn't solve all kinds of malleability and is very useful in some practical cases by solving all signature malleability. As said, we don't want to eliminate all forms of malleability (for example, replace by fee), although we may want to "address them" at some level. As you have said, wallets should be looking at scriptPubKeys, not transaction ID, but that is orthogonal to SW, a normalized tx ID and signature malleability. _______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
