On Wednesday, October 21, 2015 6:22:25 PM Danny Thorpe wrote: > Let's keep canonical ordering separate from the normalized transaction ID > proposal. Baby steps. Normalized transaction IDs provide an immediate > benefit against the hazard of third party manipulation of transactions in > the mempool, even without canonical ordering.
My point is that third-party manipulation is not much more of a problem than signing-party manipulation. Solving the former (at a high cost), without solving the latter, seems not worth it IMO. Luke _______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
