On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 8:35 PM, Tom Zander via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > Fortunately I can say that while we certainly value your opinion, when peoples > opinions are hard to read, as you indicated they can be, we should look at > their actions. The group has followed the consensus rule quite rigorously, > which I applaud.
What "consensus rule" do you refer to? Indeed, I suggest you look to actions-- it's not hard to find changes in Bitcoin Core that one contributor or another disliked. Did you try? (In this case, I don't even believe we have any regulator contributors that disagree). -- even for changes that effected system consensus, in fact. These things were not hard-forks, however, as there never has been one (+/- terminology disputes); and part of the point I was making was that the standard for that is different, and that these differences begin with technological fundamentals. _______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
