On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 9:08 PM, Tom Zander via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > On Monday 5. October 2015 20.56.34 Gregory Maxwell wrote: >> (In this case, I don't even believe we have any regulator >> contributors that disagree). > > Regular contributor? > > Please explain how for a fork in the protocol should you only listen to > regular Bitcoin Core contributors?
I'm providing some perspective and scope-- referencing again your comment about following actions-- what element of the many dozens of responses suggests to you that _anyone_ is not being listened to? While I'm sure its not intended; your selective editing ends up butchering the meaning---- I pointed out that there have been disputes, even ones involving regular contributors (and, implicitly, that I'm not lying by omission in not mentioning that the dispute was a joke or from someone well known to attack Bitcoin) or-- in other words, evidence that the disagreement was not less meaningful than what you're talking about here. That's all, sorry I was unclear again. Did you see in my message that I invited you to take a look for examples-- I think they're easily found and you would find it informative. I really recommend spending some time looking. _______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
