On Monday 5. October 2015 20.33.04 s7r via bitcoin-dev wrote: > For example, I don't see this controversial nor a violation of the BIP > requirements. Mike had some fair objections, they were explained by > gmaxwell and Jorge, everybody understood. The explanation is clear, > with plausible practical examples, so from my point of view the > objections have no arguments to sustain the claim.
I enjoyed reading them, but I have to admit I'm not convinced and for me the objections stand. Softforks are unnecessarily dangerous and I feel entirely avoidable. It is a risk that not worth taking. _______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
