That's correct. Dan
----- Original Message ----- > From: "Andrzej Oleś" <andrzej.o...@gmail.com> > To: "Robert M. Flight" <rfligh...@gmail.com> > Cc: "Marcin Kosiński" <m.p.kosin...@gmail.com>, "bioc-devel" > <bioc-devel@r-project.org>, "Dan Tenenbaum" > <dtene...@fredhutch.org> > Sent: Wednesday, May 4, 2016 8:15:36 AM > Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] downloads number status shields for packages > Hi Marcin, Robert, > > I think one problem with raw counts is that these reflect only downloads > from BioC servers and not from the mirrors - is that correct @Dan? > > Cheers, > Andrzej > > On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 5:11 PM, Robert M. Flight <rfligh...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Those numbers are used to calculate the percentile download stat that is >> already on a given bioconductor package landing page. See >> http://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/RTCGA.html >> >> I believe this was the way the Bioc admins went instead of just raw >> downloads. >> >> -Robert >> >> On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 10:58 AM Marcin Kosiński <m.p.kosin...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> > Hi all, >> > >> > Have anyone considered creating shields (http://shields.io/) with the >> > status of total downloads number for packages held on bioc? This already >> > works for CRAN packages http://cranlogs.r-pkg.org/ >> > >> > It could take total `Nb of downloads` from the right table like here >> > http://bioconductor.org/packages/stats/bioc/RTCGA.html >> > >> > Best, >> > Marcin >> > >> > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list >> > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel >> > >> >> [[alternative HTML version deleted]] >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list >> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel _______________________________________________ Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
