I'm completely unable to fix the top-post/body comments here, so my comments
are at the bottom:
On Mar 28, 2013, at 1:52 PM, Jim Bucks <jbu...@coloradostudios.com> wrote:
> No I have not tried that, but .101 is a leased IP address for a Windows
> workstation.
>
> I'm willing to try it, but it seems like that would mean I would need a zone
> like this for all of my leased addresses???
>
>
> Jim
>
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 11:42 AM, Jim Glassford <jmgl...@iup.edu> wrote:
> Hi Jim,
>
> Lost track but have you tried using the IP address of the server for the
> primary, 172.10.20.101 instead of 127.0.0.1?
>
> zone dhcp.coloradostudios.com. {
> primary 172.10.20.101; <----- change from
> 127.0.0.1
> key DHCP_UPDATER;
> }
I think there is a lot of confusion as to what is going on in this thread.
I was pointed to the following page earlier today (in a completely unrelated
conversation), and think that reading over it might help the original poster to
figure out what is going on:
http://www.semicomplete.com/articles/dynamic-dns-with-dhcp/
AlanC
--
Alan Clegg | +1-919-355-8851 | a...@clegg.com
_______________________________________________
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
