On Mar 18, 2013, at 23.04, Gerry Reno <gr...@verizon.net> wrote: > On 03/18/2013 10:25 PM, b...@bitrate.net wrote: >> On Mar 18, 2013, at 20.27, Gerry Reno <gr...@verizon.net> wrote: >> >>> Using BIND 9.8.2 >>> >>> When you setup Samba 4 AD DC using BIND9_DLZ and your domain has external >>> servers (eg: www,mail) at external providers >>> this means that the ISP and the internal network nameservers will both have >>> SOA record for the domain. >> it's not really anything particularly related to samba or dlz. it's just >> two different computers serving the same zone. you're just "hijacking" or >> overloading that particular label. in addition to declaring the zone in >> your config, you'll need to delegate that new zone from the parent. >> >> it's worth noting that this scales poorly. having to add delegations and >> zone declarations for every label for which this is desired becomes quickly >> prohibitive. instead, i'd suggest using a subdomain for samba - e.g. >> something like ad.example.com. there are a number of other solutions as >> well which would likely be more sensible than hijacking labels. >> >> -ben >> > > If it was more than just a few labels I would do it another way. > > But this will suffice, if I can only get bind to actually get the forward > zone working. > > I don't need any delegation. I'm not looking to slave the zone.
as i said, you'll need to delegate that new zone from the parent. i'm not sure what slaves zones would have to do with that. -ben _______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
