On 03/18/2013 10:25 PM, b...@bitrate.net wrote: > On Mar 18, 2013, at 20.27, Gerry Reno <gr...@verizon.net> wrote: > >> Using BIND 9.8.2 >> >> When you setup Samba 4 AD DC using BIND9_DLZ and your domain has external >> servers (eg: www,mail) at external providers >> this means that the ISP and the internal network nameservers will both have >> SOA record for the domain. > it's not really anything particularly related to samba or dlz. it's just two > different computers serving the same zone. you're just "hijacking" or > overloading that particular label. in addition to declaring the zone in your > config, you'll need to delegate that new zone from the parent. > > it's worth noting that this scales poorly. having to add delegations and > zone declarations for every label for which this is desired becomes quickly > prohibitive. instead, i'd suggest using a subdomain for samba - e.g. > something like ad.example.com. there are a number of other solutions as well > which would likely be more sensible than hijacking labels. > > -ben >
If it was more than just a few labels I would do it another way. But this will suffice, if I can only get bind to actually get the forward zone working. I don't need any delegation. I'm not looking to slave the zone. I just need the forward zone to work and send the question over to the ISP. -Gerry _______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
