In message <5091adef.1040...@dougbarton.us>, Doug Barton writes:
> On 10/31/2012 03:56 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
> > You are equating a practice that was techically wrong, and known
> > to be wrong from the get go, with one that has never been techically
> > wrong.
>
> Yes, I'm making exactly the same judgment that typical users make. "It
> works, so it must be Ok."
>
> The fact that we ("experts") can get away with something, whether it's
> technically right/wrong/indifferent not withstanding, doesn't mean that
> it's good advice for the average user.
>
> Doug
Putting in delegations where they are not needed introduces additional
work and more places that can go wrong.
Mark
--
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org
_______________________________________________
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
