On 10/31/2012 5:15 PM, Phil Mayers wrote:
On 10/31/2012 06:51 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
It may or may not be strictly necessary to do this depending on
everything else you have in the zone, but it's safer in the long term to
do it this way.
Are you suggesting it's best of the OP creates "l2.example.com" as a
sub-zone?
Why it this necessary / safer?
I know of at least 2 commerically-available DNS maintenance systems
that, by default, do not allow what they call "dotted hostnames", by
which they mean a name which is at least 2 labels below a zone cut, e.g.
"foo.bar" in the "example.com" zone. Their underlying assumption seems
to be that *every* level of the hierarchy will, in the
usual/typical/default case, be delegated.
I don't agree with this assumption in the slightest, but some people are
afraid of changing default behaviors...
- Kevin
_______________________________________________
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
