On Oct 31 2012, Phil Mayers wrote:
On 10/31/2012 06:51 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
It may or may not be strictly necessary to do this depending on
everything else you have in the zone, but it's safer in the long term to
do it this way.
Are you suggesting it's best of the OP creates "l2.example.com" as a
sub-zone?
Why it this necessary / safer?
It certainly isn't necessary. We have plenty of zone cuts more than one
label deep into the parent zone. And of course such delegations are
*extremely* common in the reverse lookup trees, with the IPv6 one
probably providing records for the number of labels between cuts.
I don't see how "safer" would apply, either.
--
Chris Thompson
Email: c...@cam.ac.uk
_______________________________________________
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
