On 01/02/2012 11:16, Barry Margolin wrote:
> In article <mailman.654.1325531095.68562.bind-us...@lists.isc.org>,
> Kevin Darcy <k...@chrysler.com> wrote:
>
>> I agree with Matus. BIND should be as self-sufficient as possible, and
>> not make any assumptions about the capability of and/or the data it
>> expects to get from the system resolver
>
> If the system resolver is good enough for every other application
> running on the system, it should be good enough for BIND.
>
> Why not at least allow this as an option?
+1
Given that there exist today name server solutions that are
authoritative-only, it makes sense that BIND 9 should have a knob to do
this.
Also, consider the potential harm of cache poisoning when the features
are mixed.
Doug
--
You can observe a lot just by watching. -- Yogi Berra
Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
_______________________________________________
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
