Dnia 2010-12-29 13:55 T. Wunderlich napisał(a): >Thanks a lot for all your suggestions. I haven't found a solution yet, but found something >which got my attention: > >Have a look at the TTL of the following CNAME entries. > >What happens when the lookup lasts longer than those 57 seconds? Maybe named will get >in trouble then?
Wow, a lookup that takes more than 57 seconds? Now that's a loooong query, even on a busy server. Anyway, if you happen to ask the server second time after 56 seconds, than that's more probable. I guess it should work correctly nonetheless. > >AND what do the RFC say about those CNAME chains? CNAME points to a CNAME? It's not incorrect, but discouraged. See http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1034, last two paragraphs of section 3.6.2 Torinthiel _______________________________________________ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
