On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 01:43:06AM -0800 drieux wrote:
> On Dec 9, 2003, at 1:24 AM, Tassilo von Parseval wrote:
> [..]
> >>hypothetical question,
> >>
> >>would one need to be a perl-porter
> >>to write good perl?
> [..]
>
> let us get simple.
>
> how about answering the simple question.
>
> it was the core of your alleged argument.
No, it wasn't. Since you are so sure about it, maybe you just quote the
relevant parts of what I wrote instead of making wild assumptions.
The core of my statement was that Perl wouldn't be Perl as we know it if
there hadn't been some people with academic backgrounds working on its
core. This was a direct reply to your claim that academic education is
essentially useless.
Tassilo
--
$_=q#",}])!JAPH!qq(tsuJ[{@"tnirp}3..0}_$;//::niam/s~=)]3[))_$-3(rellac(=_$({
pam{rekcahbus})(rekcah{lrePbus})(lreP{rehtonabus})!JAPH!qq(rehtona{tsuJbus#;
$_=reverse,s+(?<=sub).+q#q!'"qq.\t$&."'!#+sexisexiixesixeseg;y~\n~~dddd;eval
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<http://learn.perl.org/> <http://learn.perl.org/first-response>
