Hi, I think a little more info is needed to narrow down whether or not these restore transfer figures are slow in this particular case.
How is the hotplug SATA-II restore disk connected (RAID controller, or USB), and is it connected to the bacula server directly, or through a client? Also, where/how is the backup data stored? -- Graham ________________________________ From: Lionel PLASSE Sent: 23 December 2021 09:35 To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net <bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net> Subject: [Bacula-users] Restore experience report Hello, I just post my full restore experience for performance studying purpose. I use Bacula 9.6.6.3 & - 10.3.30-MariaDB on a Debian 11 buster x64 i5-2320 3Ghz CPU - 32GB ram For the 1st restoration (by baculum wizard interface) FULL on Western Digital Blue 500Gb (DOS partition table and NTFS partition) : Where: /srv Replace: Never Start time: 22-déc.-2021 09:19:43 End time: 22-déc.-2021 12:04:47 Elapsed time: 2 hours 45 mins 4 secs Files Expected: 202,006 Files Restored: 202,027 Bytes Restored: 32,650,343,324 (32.65 GB) Rate: 3296.7 KB/s FD Errors: 0 FD termination status: OK SD termination status: OK Termination: Restore OK ~2h25 of restoration cause there was 3 volumes in use for restoration (FULL/DIFF&INCR) and I didn't noticed the request of changing volume. The rate is a bit slow I think. (max rate was 5 MB/s) I'm performing now an other full resto with a greater size of restoration on a 4TB Westerndigital Violet (GPT & NTFS partition) The rate is curently 10.62 MB/s Feed back the result this afternoon (I hope) What do you think of the performance, is it possible to do better ? knowing that the restored disk is on a hotplug SATA II interface. _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
_______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
