On 09/24/17 20:24, Andrew Ryder wrote: > Hello, > > I'm having an issue after upgrading from version 7 to version 9 where if > I'm restoring from a job that spans more than one tape the job fails as > soon as bacula hits the end of the first tape. Is there a new > configuration option or something that needs to be set so it will wait > for me to load the next tape rather than failing?
This bug was reported on August 10 as bug #0002304. It is possible to mostly work around it by resuming from the first file on the next tape as a separate backup job. The file that spans the tape change will have to be restored from a different backup in which it does not span a tape boundary. Any single file larger than a single tape is probably not restorable until bug #0002304 is fixed. -- Phil Stracchino Babylon Communications ph...@caerllewys.net p...@co.ordinate.org Landline: +1.603.293.8485 Mobile: +1.603.998.6958 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
