Martin you are right , but in the last years, even the opposite has been true: newer file daemon works with older dir/sd.
Regards >>>>> On Fri, 18 Aug 2017 08:37:56 +0000, Davide Giunchi said: > > Today i've upgraded one bacula-fd to the 9.0.3 version, if i now run a > backup job of that file daemon with a 7.4.0 director and storage daemon, i > get this error: > > ... > > Kern has always said that "Older File Daemons *should* be compatible with > the x.x.x Director" and this has been true for years, it seems that with > this (9.0.3) latest version you need to align DIR with FD and SD. Haven't you done the exact opposite of Kern's advice and used a *newer* File Daemon? __Martin ________________________________ Iscriviti alla nostra newsletter per rimanere aggiornato su digital ed email marketing! http://www.magnews.it/newsletter/ The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and destroy this email. Any unauthorized, direct or indirect, disclosure, copying, storage, distribution or other use is strictly forbidden. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
