On 2017-03-06 at 11:27:20 Josip Deanovic wrote: > On Monday 2017-03-06 10:57:03 Erik P. Olsen wrote: > > On 2017-03-06 at 09:48:40 Kern Sibbald wrote: > > > Yes, the manual assumes you did a standard rpm or deb install > > > without Selinux. If you did anything else, either you are on > > > your own, or you must come back to a standard install. > > > > > > And if I happen to install without selinux what advice do I get from > > this message? > > Are you using selinux? > > If you do, I would suggest to turn it off (not just because of > bacula). It's unreliable, too complex and almost certainly will make > more harm than good. It will also make you think that your system > substantially more secure. > > If you really need security enhanced system there are other solutions > that have proven themselves to actually make system more secure and > they are often less complex and easier to maintain but I don't want > to go into it because it would leave the scope of this mailing list. > > > Anyways, if you want to continue with selinux you will have to > learn how it works, how to manage it and how to debug it in order > to understand how your bacula processes relate to different files > and then you have to setup a proper selinux context for that files. > I believe it's possible to find many articles on this subject on the > internet. > >
This was something Kern brought up out of the blue. I need no advice on selinux. Read my previous messages about my bacula problems. If you can offer advice on these problems I would be more than happy. And contrary to what Kern thinks I do read manuals. -- Venlig hilsen, Erik P. Olsen Solsortvej 30 2000 Frederiksberg ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
