On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 8:32 AM, Uwe Schuerkamp <uwe.schuerk...@nionex.net> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 08:24:07AM -0500, John Drescher wrote: >> > I just ran into this. After a Google search, I turned up an article that >> > says the indices that used to make Bacula run faster now cause a >> > performance >> > problem with recent versions of Bacula and recent versions of MySQL (it's >> > on >> > the Bacula wiki, the address for which I don't have handy). I removed all >> > of >> > the indices I had on the file table and restores only take a few minutes >> > now. >> >> Even though you have a tiny database I would still look into tuning >> your mysql settings. A lot of distributions ship with a ridiculous >> default configuration that assumes your PC has 64MB of ram or similar. >> >> John >> > > I'd like to have the above point clarified by the people in the know: > Are File table indices recommended with bacula versions > 5.0 or not? > Can the original poster provide a link to the article mentioned above? >
I did not mean file table indices (I am not sure about these - I use postgresql with bacula). However I meant tuning the database parameters to allow mysql server to use more memory. I have had to do that for other mysql usage. John ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS, MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft MVPs and experts. SALE $99.99 this month only -- learn more at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122412 _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
