On 4/12/2011 4:04 PM, Pablo Marques wrote:
I have a setup to backup lots of clients over slow links.
I want to have each client (or group of clients) backed up to
dedicated client pools, so client1 will go to pool client1, and so on.
That way I have better control of the space used, if a client goes
away I can simply delete the tapes (or files) an get the space back
immediately.
Also it gives me better control on the retention on a per client basis.
The problem is that when I try to backup multiple clients at the same
time, the storage process has to wait for each job to finish before it
can move to the next because it needs to change the tape (different
client --> different pool). Some clients may take many hours to
finish, forcing everybody else to wait.
I enabled spooling, but it seems like Bacula requires to mount a tape
from the client pool on a drive before the client spooling can begin.
Can this be avoided?
A possible solution would be to do all backups on a special pool and
after they are done migrate later each client job to each client pool.
But I cannot find a way to modify the "Next Pool" dynamically. It is
a fixed setting on the Pool definition.
Does anybody have suggestions on how to accomplish this?
Look into Maximum Concurrent Jobs in your Storage definition.
Regards,
Randy
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Forrester Wave Report - Recovery time is now measured in hours and minutes
not days. Key insights are discussed in the 2010 Forrester Wave Report as
part of an in-depth evaluation of disaster recovery service providers.
Forrester found the best-in-class provider in terms of services and vision.
Read this report now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/ibm-webcastpromo
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
