I have a setup to backup lots of clients over slow links.
I want to have each client (or group of clients) backed up to dedicated client
pools, so client1 will go to pool client1, and so on.
That way I have better control of the space used, if a client goes away I can
simply delete the tapes (or files) an get the space back immediately.
Also it gives me better control on the retention on a per client basis.
The problem is that when I try to backup multiple clients at the same time, the
storage process has to wait for each job to finish before it can move to the
next because it needs to change the tape (different client --> different pool).
Some clients may take many hours to finish, forcing everybody else to wait.
I enabled spooling, but it seems like Bacula requires to mount a tape from the
client pool on a drive before the client spooling can begin.
Can this be avoided?
A possible solution would be to do all backups on a special pool and after they
are done migrate later each client job to each client pool.
But I cannot find a way to modify the "Next Pool" dynamically. It is a fixed
setting on the Pool definition.
Does anybody have suggestions on how to accomplish this?
Thanks
Pablo
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Forrester Wave Report - Recovery time is now measured in hours and minutes
not days. Key insights are discussed in the 2010 Forrester Wave Report as
part of an in-depth evaluation of disaster recovery service providers.
Forrester found the best-in-class provider in terms of services and vision.
Read this report now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/ibm-webcastpromo
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
