Il 11/03/2011 10:48, Laurent HENRY ha scritto: > Le Wednesday 09 March 2011 16:28:52, vous avez écrit : >>> I tried to enable spooling (500 Gb spool) for the tape backup. The perf >>> were worse. >> >> BTW, I use 5GB spool. >> >> I assume then you do not run concurrent jobs? For a single job the >> time will be longer because bacula does not concurrently spool and >> despool but with concurrent jobs and spooling with a few GB spool size >> bacula will maximize the performance of the tape drive when spooling >> is enabled. I get despool rates of 20 to 50MB/s for LTO2 which is >> about what the tape drive can handle. The rates vary because of >> compression. > > Yes, i use just one job at a time. > >> >>> For disk backup, it seems to me spooling does not make sense. >> >> Attribute spooling makes sense for either though. > > Attribute spooling ? >
It refers to spooling of file attributes. IME if you activate spooling, file attributes are automatically spooled as well. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Colocation vs. Managed Hosting > A question and answer guide to determining the best fit > for your organization - today and in the future. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d > _______________________________________________ > Bacula-users mailing list > Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users -- Marcello Romani ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Colocation vs. Managed Hosting A question and answer guide to determining the best fit for your organization - today and in the future. http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
