On 01/06/11 12:36, Sean Clark wrote:
> I think if you give the virtual full a lower priority than the
> incremental, you can schedule both for the same day and have it always
> do the incremental then the virtual full in the correct order (haven't
> actually TRIED to do this myself, so I'm guessing).
The problem with this is that *none* of the VirtualFulls will run until
*no* higher-priority job is running. Which means that a single
long-running job, say a Full backup of a large server, could cause all
of your VirtualFulls to be delayed until it finishes.
--
Phil Stracchino, CDK#2 DoD#299792458 ICBM: 43.5607, -71.355
ala...@caerllewys.net ala...@metrocast.net p...@co.ordinate.org
Renaissance Man, Unix ronin, Perl hacker, Free Stater
It's not the years, it's the mileage.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Learn how Oracle Real Application Clusters (RAC) One Node allows customers
to consolidate database storage, standardize their database environment, and,
should the need arise, upgrade to a full multi-node Oracle RAC database
without downtime or disruption
http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
