> -----Original Message----- > From: Phil Stracchino [mailto:ala...@metrocast.net] > Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 3:05 PM > To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Simplified pools > > On 04/06/10 17:28, Kevin Keane wrote: > >> From: Phil Stracchino [mailto:ala...@metrocast.net] > >> > >> Actually, this is a problem which has largely been fixed in > >> Bacula-3 and later, by changing the way overrides work. > > > > Really? I see this problem in bacula 3.0.3 all the time. Maybe I need > > to change something in my configuration to take advantage of this new > > feature. How is it supposed to work? > > The old Schedule-based overrides are still *supported* in 3.0.3, for > backward compatibility, but are deprecated - precisely because of the > problem you note - in favor of the following example syntax:
You know, I feel stupid. I immediately went to implement this mechanism - and then realized that I had actually done it already and forgotten about it! I had gotten confused by the run command in bconsole that still lists the default pool, instead of the one that would actually be used. At least that explains why I couldn't find a volume the other day where I thought I had forgotten to update the pool before running a manual backup. Thanks for that information! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
