On 04/06/10 06:00, Kevin Keane wrote:
> Your idea would solve very nicely solve one really ugly problem: when
> manually running a backup job, the job may end up in the wrong pool -
> even if you actually remembered to select the correct one. For
> instance, let's say that the most recent Differential job failed. You
> decide to re-run the job manually. Bacula is smart enough to upgrade
> the job from Incremental to Differential automatically, but it is not
> smart enough to move the job from the Incremental to the Differential
> pool.

Actually, this is a problem which has largely been fixed in Bacula-3 and
later, by changing the way overrides work.


-- 
  Phil Stracchino, CDK#2     DoD#299792458     ICBM: 43.5607, -71.355
  ala...@caerllewys.net   ala...@metrocast.net   p...@co.ordinate.org
         Renaissance Man, Unix ronin, Perl hacker, Free Stater
                 It's not the years, it's the mileage.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Reply via email to